Choosing the right anodizing type for marine application

0
F
1

Hi all, I’m currently working on a marine application focusing on submersible components that require 6061-T6 aluminium. The part must undergo anodizing to ensure its wear and corrosion resistance when exposed to seawater.
At the moment I’m considering type III hard anodizing. However, I have some concerns regarding the possibility of fatigue cracks in the anodized layer due to the part experiencing tensile stresses up to 40,000 psi and compressive stresses up to 35,000 psi and high cycle fatigue (with stress cycles expected to exceed 10^5 cycles). I’m afraid that further cracks could not only lead to corrosion but also cause the part to crack.
Considering the need for both corrosion resistance and wear resistance, I’m determining the most suitable type and thickness for the anodized layer. Initial recommendations suggest a thickness of 25-50 μm for type III anodizing to provide a good balance between wear resistance and the ability to withstand mechanical stresses without significant risk of cracking.

However, I’m interested in hearing if there are alternative recommendations or insights based on practical experiences or additional research. Thank you!

Gelöst vonAttila Szucs

Hi Frederik,

You’re on the right path with Type III hard anodizing for your submersible components. The 25-50 μm thickness is generally good for balancing wear resistance and minimizing cracking risk under stress.

However, considering your concerns about high-cycle fatigue, you might explore a thinner layer or use a post-anodizing sealing process like nickel acetate or hot water sealing to enhance corrosion resistance. Also, consider duplex coatings or other protective measures suited for marine environments.

Regular stress tests and inspections will also be crucial to detect any early signs of failure.

Best of luck with your project!

Cheers!

    • F

      Hi all, I’m currently working on a marine application focusing on submersible components that require 6061-T6 aluminium. The part must undergo anodizing to ensure its wear and corrosion resistance when exposed to seawater.
      At the moment I’m considering type III hard anodizing. However, I have some concerns regarding the possibility of fatigue cracks in the anodized layer due to the part experiencing tensile stresses up to 40,000 psi and compressive stresses up to 35,000 psi and high cycle fatigue (with stress cycles expected to exceed 10^5 cycles). I’m afraid that further cracks could not only lead to corrosion but also cause the part to crack.
      Considering the need for both corrosion resistance and wear resistance, I’m determining the most suitable type and thickness for the anodized layer. Initial recommendations suggest a thickness of 25-50 μm for type III anodizing to provide a good balance between wear resistance and the ability to withstand mechanical stresses without significant risk of cracking.

      However, I’m interested in hearing if there are alternative recommendations or insights based on practical experiences or additional research. Thank you!

      0
    • Xometry Engineer

      Hi Frederik,

      You’re on the right path with Type III hard anodizing for your submersible components. The 25-50 μm thickness is generally good for balancing wear resistance and minimizing cracking risk under stress.

      However, considering your concerns about high-cycle fatigue, you might explore a thinner layer or use a post-anodizing sealing process like nickel acetate or hot water sealing to enhance corrosion resistance. Also, consider duplex coatings or other protective measures suited for marine environments.

      Regular stress tests and inspections will also be crucial to detect any early signs of failure.

      Best of luck with your project!

      Cheers!

      0
      Antworten
Choosing the right anodizing type for marine application
Deine Information:




Empfohlene Themen

Thema
Antworten
Ansichten
Aktivitäten
Vergleich von Nylon 12 (PA 12) SLS mit PA6 GF30
Frage zu Nylon 12 (PA 12) glasfaserverstärkt (SLS) - ist das oben genannte Verfahren und Material am besten mit dem Material PA6 GF30 vergleichbar?
R
1
412
Mai 02
3D-Druck – dekorative Elemente
Hallo zusammen, ich möchte einige schlanke Dekorteile (sie sind 1,5-2 mm dick) für ein Musikinstrument mittels 3D-Druck herstellen lassen. Im Anhang findet ihr einen Screenshot eines der Modelle zur Ansicht. Könntet ihr spezielle Technologien... Mehr erfahren
A
T
4
693
Apr 30
PA12 und chemische Dampfglättung: Beständigkeit gegen Meerwasser?
Guten Tag, Ich habe eine kleine Frage: hält chemisch dampfgeglättetes PA12 (mit SLS/MJF) gut in Meerwasserbedingungen? Ich überlege, es für Teile zu verwenden, die häufig Meerwasserbedingungen ausgesetzt sind. Ich weiß, dass chemische Dampfglättung die... Mehr erfahren
P
2
664
Apr 10
Benötige Empfehlungen für eine feste Aluminiumlegierung
Hallo, ich entwerfe einen Flaschenöffner und möchte Aluminium verwenden. Ich brauche eine Legierung, die stark genug ist. Der Öffner wird nicht sehr dünn sein, ich denke an 3-4 mm an den dünnsten Stellen, so... Mehr erfahren
B
4
1.0k
Mrz 11
Flame retardant materials for CNC machining
Hello,I'm working on a project that requires producing flame retardant plastic connectors with very precise tolerances. I'm looking into CNC machining as injection molding seems not to be an option due to the precision... Mehr erfahren
Z
4
220
Jun 12