en – EU
Knowledge & Community
Search
K
Quote & source your parts
Türkiye Türkiye
United Kingdom United Kingdom
Global Global
select
navigate
switch tabs
Esc close

Design challenge: rope-to-rope transfer in a small cylindrical coupling

0
V
4

Hi, working now on a small-scale linear actuator project and need a compact coupling between two coaxial cylinders. Both are 44 mm in diameter, with the upper one hollow (22 mm inner Ø). The idea is to transfer a pulling force (~80 N) from a Dyneema rope running outside the lower cylinder to a rope that runs inside the upper one. I’ve already built a clutch with a rotatable ring and radial sliders that lock an adapter in place at ±60° from neutral. That part works fine, but I’m struggling with the mechanism that should selectively connect the internal rope either to string A or string B, depending on the ring position. Ideally, the mechanism should tolerate any angular orientation when the adapter is inserted, and I’d like to keep it 3D-printable. Has anyone tackled a similar bidirectional rope-to-rope coupling problem in a compact form factor?

    • V

      Hi, working now on a small-scale linear actuator project and need a compact coupling between two coaxial cylinders. Both are 44 mm in diameter, with the upper one hollow (22 mm inner Ø). The idea is to transfer a pulling force (~80 N) from a Dyneema rope running outside the lower cylinder to a rope that runs inside the upper one. I’ve already built a clutch with a rotatable ring and radial sliders that lock an adapter in place at ±60° from neutral. That part works fine, but I’m struggling with the mechanism that should selectively connect the internal rope either to string A or string B, depending on the ring position. Ideally, the mechanism should tolerate any angular orientation when the adapter is inserted, and I’d like to keep it 3D-printable. Has anyone tackled a similar bidirectional rope-to-rope coupling problem in a compact form factor?

      0
    • E

      Hey Victor, for 3D-printing specifically, the cleanest route might be a sliding shuttle inside the hollow cylinder. The shuttle has two sockets, one for rope A and one for rope B. A keyed track linked to your clutch ring decides which socket lines up with the incoming rope. The advantage of this is that you avoid small cams or springs, which are tricky to print at that size. But a downside is you’ll need precise tolerances to keep friction low.

      0
      Reply
Design challenge: rope-to-rope transfer in a small cylindrical coupling
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
DFM check: Is this part a “nightmare” to machine?
Hi! Designing a custom housing for a prototype. I’ve got features on all six sides, and I’m realizing this is going to need a ton of CNC setups. In your experience, is it better... read more
J
0
22
Robust actuator-to-brake pedal joint for angled, high-force actuation
hi, i am designing a push-rod connection between a linear actuator and a vehicle brake pedal for a durability test setup. The actuator can apply 750 N, and the pedal rotates through its travel,... read more
f
H
W
12
150
Mar 16
Flatness GD&T for 6061 plates
For a mounting plate for a precision sensor (about 200 mm × 200 mm) I was going to call out a flatness of 0.05 mm, but my senior engineer says that’s overkill and will double the machining... read more
K
E
U
3
326
Mar 14
ISO 2768-mK vs specific tolerances
Hey guys, I’m getting some pushback from our shop lead. I’ve been dimensioning every single feature on a new manifold block because I’m paranoid about fitment, but he says the drawing is "unreadable" and... read more
l
P
2
425
Mar 14