select
navigate
switch tabs
Esc close

Is PLA truly biocompatible?

0
A
1

Looking for advice. I’m looking at PLA for single-use medical prototypes because of its biodegradable properties, but I’m not sure about its suitability for biocompatibility in short-term contact with human skin or fluids. Any experience or insights into whether standard PLA grades can meet biocompatibility requirements, or would I need to source medical-grade PLA for this application?

Solved by Vincent D
PLA is inherently biocompatible because it can be broken down by natural processes into lactic acid (by hydrolysis of the ester bonds), and then further into products that leave the body with urine. In fact, PLA has been applied for medical uses since the 1970s and is (I think) the single most widely used biopolymer in the medical industry. So for short-term contact, I’d expect that it is perfectly fine. If you are looking to use standard grades, just be sure that it is essentially pure PLA, to be confident of the biocompatibility. You need to be careful with PLA filament for 3D printing, as it is more likely to contain additives to improve the behavior during printing, and the properties of the completed print. These additives can include calcium carbonate, acrylics, and fillers, which may not be biocompatible.
    • A

      Looking for advice. I’m looking at PLA for single-use medical prototypes because of its biodegradable properties, but I’m not sure about its suitability for biocompatibility in short-term contact with human skin or fluids. Any experience or insights into whether standard PLA grades can meet biocompatibility requirements, or would I need to source medical-grade PLA for this application?

      0
    • V

      PLA is inherently biocompatible because it can be broken down by natural processes into lactic acid (by hydrolysis of the ester bonds), and then further into products that leave the body with urine. In fact, PLA has been applied for medical uses since the 1970s and is (I think) the single most widely used biopolymer in the medical industry. So for short-term contact, I’d expect that it is perfectly fine.

      If you are looking to use standard grades, just be sure that it is essentially pure PLA, to be confident of the biocompatibility. You need to be careful with PLA filament for 3D printing, as it is more likely to contain additives to improve the behavior during printing, and the properties of the completed print. These additives can include calcium carbonate, acrylics, and fillers, which may not be biocompatible.

      0
      Reply
Is PLA truly biocompatible?
Your information:




Cancel

Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
Choosing a production process for low-volume over-molded elastomer grip
Hi! Deciding between low-volume production options for a small elastomeric over-molded grip on a handheld power tool. The part has undercuts and thin ribs, and we need decent tear resistance, but only ~200–300 pcs/year.... read more
A
0
42
Jan 22
Choosing PA12 vs PA12-CF for an SLS-printed automotive cam cover prototype
hey, I’m working on a three-piece cam/valve cover for a small automotive engine project, mainly a functional prototype that will see real under-hood temperatures, oil mist, and vibration, but not long-term production use. The... read more
h
l
1
50
Jan 22
Surface Finish
I am looking to have some Aluminium samples made............without adding extra post process operations what is the best surface finish possible (um) ?
a
j
0
69
Jan 20
Choosing the right tool steel grade for a high-volume stamping die
hi, I’m designing a cold-formed stamping die for thin stainless-steel sheets (gauge ~1.5 mm) used in an enclosure that will see around 500 k cycles. Given that abrasion resistance and dimensional stability over long... read more
J
D
1
335
Dec 17
Blasting and anodizing order on aluminum parts
Hello! need help - am working on a set of 6061-T6 aluminum control knobs for a small instrument panel, and the surface finish is important since they’ll be handled frequently and remain visible. The... read more
J
C
1
508
Dec 09