select
navigate
switch tabs
Esc close

Mesh accuracy concerns with FDM

0
M
3

I’m working on a small gear-driven mechanism for a camera panning rig and considering printing the 45° bevel gears in PETG (FDM). Tooth pitch is 1.5 mm, and the gears will be rotating slowly under low torque. My concern is whether layer lines and over-extrusion could cause poor meshing or increased backlash, especially since the gears need to run smoothly for accurate motion control. Would post-processing like sanding the teeth tips make a noticeable difference?

    • M

      I’m working on a small gear-driven mechanism for a camera panning rig and considering printing the 45° bevel gears in PETG (FDM). Tooth pitch is 1.5 mm, and the gears will be rotating slowly under low torque. My concern is whether layer lines and over-extrusion could cause poor meshing or increased backlash, especially since the gears need to run smoothly for accurate motion control. Would post-processing like sanding the teeth tips make a noticeable difference?

      0
    • n

      FDM-printed PETG gears can work for low-torque applications, but layer lines and minor over-extrusion will likely affect meshing smoothness. Since your gears have a fine, even small imperfections could introduce slight backlash or tightness. Light sanding of the tooth tips and flanks could help, but it’s hard to achieve perfect uniformity by hand. Have you considered printing a test pair and dry-running them to check for binding or excessive play?

      0
      Reply
      • M
        neil barnes

        I haven’t printed a test set yet—wanted to get some advice first. Would printing at a higher resolution (e.g., 0.1 mm layer height) or using a smaller nozzle (0.2 mm) improve tooth definition enough to reduce backlash? Also, if backlash is an issue, maybe I’ll add a spring-loaded tensioner. Would lubricating the gears (e.g., with silicone grease) help with layer-line friction?

        0
        Reply
      • n
        Massimiliano

        layer-line friction entirely. PETG’s slight flexibility might also introduce minor deflection under load. If smooth motion is critical, you might want to explore SLS (nylon) or MJF printing—these processes produce near-isotropic parts with tighter tolerances and no layer lines. That said, for a prototype or light-duty use, FDM could suffice with some trial-and-error tuning.

        In terms of lubricating, yes, light lubricant will reduce friction and noise from layer lines. Just avoid oils that might degrade PETG. A tensioner is a smart backup—let me know how the test goes! If you hit persistent issues, resin printing (for higher detail) or outsourcing to SLS could be next-step options. Good luck!

        0
        Reply
Mesh accuracy concerns with FDM
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
Minimum letter size for raised text on SLS nylon parts
I’m working on a medical device enclosure that needs raised lettering (product name and serial number) on the lid, printed in SLS nylon. The letters are around 2 mm high with a stroke width... read more
m
j
4
28
Oct 30
2 mm stainless sheet bend radius
I’d like some help with a project. I’m designing a stainless steel 304 enclosure with multiple 90° flanges (sheet thickness ~2 mm). For strength and edge alignment, I want the inside bend radius to... read more
L
C
4
121
Oct 24
Urethane casting for sensor housings
Hello all, I’m looking for some advice. I’m working on a prototype of a handheld casing for an outdoor sensor (approx. 20×10×5 cm) that needs to be rigid, weather-resistant, and have fine surface details.... read more
a
0
76
Oct 17
Will a threaded hub and locknut hold up in a conveyor roller assembly?
hi! my project is a small conveyor assembly where the rollers need to be swapped out fairly often, depending on the material we’re running. I’m considering using an M14 threaded connection between the aluminum... read more
P
R
4
79
Oct 22
Printed aluminum parts in pressure applications
Hi! Questioning about prototyping a hydraulic valve housing (normally CNC’d in 6061) - considering aluminum 3D printing instead, mainly to speed up design iterations. The part would see ~150 bar during bench tests, with... read more
T
0
134
Sep 29