select
navigate
switch tabs
Esc close

SLA wall thickness issue for microfluidic channels

0
B
1

Hi, I created a 3D design for a small microfluidic part using SLA (Clear Resin) with internal channels ~0.4 mm wide and wall thickness around 0.5 mm. The function relies on optical inspection through the walls, so transparency and dimensional accuracy are critical. However, in my first print, the walls came out distorted and slightly bulged, affecting both fit and visual clarity. Has anyone found a reliable minimum wall thickness for such features, or specific design tweaks that reduce distortion in thin, clear SLA parts?

    • B

      Hi, I created a 3D design for a small microfluidic part using SLA (Clear Resin) with internal channels ~0.4 mm wide and wall thickness around 0.5 mm. The function relies on optical inspection through the walls, so transparency and dimensional accuracy are critical. However, in my first print, the walls came out distorted and slightly bulged, affecting both fit and visual clarity. Has anyone found a reliable minimum wall thickness for such features, or specific design tweaks that reduce distortion in thin, clear SLA parts?

      0
    • c

      I’ve had similar issues with clear resin. At your specs, you are likely hitting limits where the bulging and distortion is caused by light bleed and peel forces. I’d suggest increasing the wall thickness to at least 0.7-0.8 mm. Thinner walls will likely bulge or warp during printing and post-curing. Also, printing your part at an angle (30-45°) will help with distortion by minimizing peel forces. You can also add fillets at the wall bases to reduce stress. For clarity, you can post-process with fine sanding and a clear resin dip. Hope this helps.

      0
      Reply
SLA wall thickness issue for microfluidic channels
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
DFM check: Is this part a “nightmare” to machine?
Hi! Designing a custom housing for a prototype. I’ve got features on all six sides, and I’m realizing this is going to need a ton of CNC setups. In your experience, is it better... read more
J
P
6
35
Mar 31
Robust actuator-to-brake pedal joint for angled, high-force actuation
hi, i am designing a push-rod connection between a linear actuator and a vehicle brake pedal for a durability test setup. The actuator can apply 750 N, and the pedal rotates through its travel,... read more
f
H
W
12
182
Mar 16
Flatness GD&T for 6061 plates
For a mounting plate for a precision sensor (about 200 mm × 200 mm) I was going to call out a flatness of 0.05 mm, but my senior engineer says that’s overkill and will double the machining... read more
K
E
U
3
368
Mar 14
ISO 2768-mK vs specific tolerances
Hey guys, I’m getting some pushback from our shop lead. I’ve been dimensioning every single feature on a new manifold block because I’m paranoid about fitment, but he says the drawing is "unreadable" and... read more
l
P
2
463
Mar 14