Tolerances Before or After Anodizing?

0
E
8

Hello, I have a question about the standard practice in the industry regarding determining tolerances for surface treatments involving anodizing. Considering that anodizing has the potential to add a few to tens of microns of layer to the surface, which could possibly affect the final dimensions and potentially cause the parts to be out of specification, how is this generally handled? When defining part tolerances, is it the norm to take into account the expected film thickness from such processes, ensuring that the final dimensions fall within the desired specifications after treatment? Or is it more common to specify tolerances for anodized, finished parts? Thanks, Nick

Solved by Mario Coppola

Ciao Nick,
for my experience I can only tell you: it depends.
We must admit that normally the treatment must be performed on finished product after all the working and therefore on precise dimensions.
With reference to the MIL-A-8625, I can tell you that the anodic oxidation type I and type II change the dimensions of the finished product by a few microns, but the anodic oxidation type III (known as Hard Anodizing) changes the finished size of the part and even modifies the roughness worsening it.

I believe it is necessary to define tolerances before and after this anodizing treatment, even the final roughness must be defined.

Keep in touch,

Mario Coppola

    • Xometry Engineer

      Hi Nick,

      It’s great to hear from someone with an interest in the intricacies of CNC manufacturing, particularly when it comes to nuanced areas like determining tolerances for surface treatments such as anodizing. With over 16 years of experience in managing the complexities of manufacturing processes, I appreciate the importance of ensuring each part meets the required specifications even after finishing processes.

      Considering Anodizing in the Design Stage: It is crucial to anticipate the effect of anodizing on part dimensions during the early stages of the design process.
      This means:
      – Understanding the thickness typically added by your anodizing process.
      – Adjusting the initial dimensions of your parts to accommodate this thickness.

      Determining Tolerances:
      – Pre-Process Tolerances: Some choose to specify the dimensions and tolerances of the part prior to anodizing, knowing that the process will add a predictable amount of material.
      – Post-Process Tolerances: Others prefer to specify tolerances for finished, anodized parts to ensure the final product is within the desired features, regardless of the added layer.

      Alternatives:
      – Designing with Anodizing in Mind: Specify part dimensions and tolerances prior to anodizing but adjusted for expected film thickness. This method requires a good understanding of how much material the anodizing process will add.
      – Specifying Final Dimensions: Specify dimensions and tolerances for finished, anodized parts. This approach can make the fit of the final assembly more predictable, but it requires a proper understanding and control of the anodizing process.

      Conclusion:
      Each method has its own advantages and challenges, and the choice often depends on the specific requirements of your project, the required precision, and the nature of the assemblies in which the parts will be used. Don’t hesitate to ask further questions or seek clarification. I’m here to assist and make the information as accessible as possible.

      Best Regards,

      Attila

      0
      Reply
      • E
        Attila Szucs

        Thank you!

        0
        Reply
    • P
      Xometry Engineer

      Hello Nick and Attila
      As a Production support engineer at Xometry, I could add that by default, when a drawing is submitted to us and an anodizing or other post-treatment is ordered, we consider that the tolerances are indicated AFTER treatment, as it would be difficult for us to know exactly the thickness obtained on all surfaces by our manufacturing partners and their anodizing partners. Our partners have then the responsibility to adapt the machining parameters accordingly.
      Happy to help
      Pierre-Yves

      0
      Reply
      • E
        Pierre-Yves Huet

        Thank you, Pierre-Yves!

        0
        Reply
    • A

      Hello there, so let me know if I understand correctly with this example. We consider making hard anodizing and indicate 15μ thickness on our drawing ; and determine our tolerance in accordance. Can we be sure that the manufacturer will adapt the machining parameters, to match with the anodizing thickness and after-processing tolerance ? 

      0
      Reply
      • Xometry Engineer
        Alex

        Thanks for reaching out with a great question! Specifying a hard anodizing thickness of 15μ on your drawing is a solid start. Here’s the scoop: achieving exact thickness in anodizing can be a bit like hitting a moving target. We usually see a swing of about +/- 3 microns. So, if your tolerance is wide, like +/- 0.2mm, you’re in the clear. But for tighter spots, like an h7 hole, we go a bit oversized pre-anodizing and cross our fingers.

        The good news? Your manufacturer will tweak machining to align with the anodizing and keep your specs in check. For those precision-critical parts, let’s chat early to hatch a plan that nails your needs.

        0
        Reply
    • Ciao Nick,
      for my experience I can only tell you: it depends.
      We must admit that normally the treatment must be performed on finished product after all the working and therefore on precise dimensions.
      With reference to the MIL-A-8625, I can tell you that the anodic oxidation type I and type II change the dimensions of the finished product by a few microns, but the anodic oxidation type III (known as Hard Anodizing) changes the finished size of the part and even modifies the roughness worsening it.

      I believe it is necessary to define tolerances before and after this anodizing treatment, even the final roughness must be defined.

      Keep in touch,

      Mario Coppola

      0
      Reply
      • E
        Mario Coppola

        Thank you for the insights!

        0
        Reply
Tolerances Before or After Anodizing?
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
FEA of a welded tow hitch
Hi! Need help on a welded tow hitch for an off-road vehicle using S355 steel tubing and 8 mm plates. It needs to handle a 3,500 kg towing load with off-axis forces. In ANSYS,... read more
L
R
1
20
Apr 10
Best gear setup for a compact robotic arm gearbox
Hi,Working on a compact gearbox for a robotic arm and need advice on the best gear setup. The arm sees intermittent loads, max torque at the output is 15 Nm, and I need about... read more
R
M
2
29
Apr 16
How to call out helicoils or inserts on a drawing?
Hey,My aluminum part needs reinforced threads, so I’m looking at using Helicoils or possibly another type of insert if the machinist has a better suggestion (I’ll have my part produced by an external manufacturer).... read more
M
1
66
Mar 31
Deep C-channel in 2 mm stainless
Hi all, working on a sheet metal design and trying to form a C-channel in 2mm stainless (304). The depth is 50mm, and I’m wondering if I’m asking for trouble with bending—springback, cracking, or... read more
E
R
M
2
69
Mar 27
Will a 6mm dowel fit in this hole?
hello, I'm designing a part with an FDM 3D printed hole to hold a 6mm wooden dowel, but I’m unsure about the actual fit due to print tolerances and material shrinkage. The hole is... read more
b
1
79
Mar 14