select
navigate
switch tabs
Esc close

3D printed vs injection molded snap-fits durability

0
T
2

Hi everyone, I want to use snap-fit joints for a 3D-printed enclosure that will be opened relatively frequently for battery replacement. I will be using ABS or PETG as I have read that they hold up well to cyclic loading. Can anyone provide insight into how 3D-printed snap joints compare to injection-molded ones, or should I explore alternative methods?

Solved by Robby76

Klaus gave some good insights, I just wanted to provide some tips to ensure a successful 3D printed joint. Make sure you print the part with the layers in line with the long axis of the cantilever snap joint, perpendicular layer lines are much weaker. Add filets on any sharp corners where the stress concentrations will be highest, i.e. on the base of the cantilever, and first print a prototype of your connection so that you can properly test it before printing the entire product.

    • T

      Hi everyone, I want to use snap-fit joints for a 3D-printed enclosure that will be opened relatively frequently for battery replacement. I will be using ABS or PETG as I have read that they hold up well to cyclic loading. Can anyone provide insight into how 3D-printed snap joints compare to injection-molded ones, or should I explore alternative methods?

      0
    • k

      Hi Tom, ABS is a great choice as it’s tougher than other common materials like PLA and PETG. Nylon is also a good choice but not all printers are able to print it. There are empirical methods to calculate the exact dimensions of the snap-fit mechanism to ensure the maximum cycle life, all you need are the specific material properties of the ABS. These equations are for injection molded joints but should still apply for 3D printed joints, just don’t expect your 3D printed joints to last as long as injection molded ones. As an alternative, you can also explore using heat insert fittings so that you can screw the parts together because ultimately injection molded snap joints will always perform better than 3D-printed ones.

      0
      Reply
      • R
        klaus kolb

        Klaus gave some good insights, I just wanted to provide some tips to ensure a successful 3D printed joint. Make sure you print the part with the layers in line with the long axis of the cantilever snap joint, perpendicular layer lines are much weaker. Add filets on any sharp corners where the stress concentrations will be highest, i.e. on the base of the cantilever, and first print a prototype of your connection so that you can properly test it before printing the entire product.

        0
        Reply
3D printed vs injection molded snap-fits durability
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
Printing a 3D Model Purchased from a Third Party
Hello, I was wondering if there would be any issues in requesting the production of a print from a model purchased from a third party.Thank you and keep up the good work! read more
s
4
84
Jan 23
Manufacturing Wheels for Fingerboards
Hello,I am writing because I am developing fingerboard wheels as a new product within my own brand. I professionally manufacture fingerboard decks and concrete obstacles, and now I am expanding my catalogue with cast... read more
j
2
174
Jan 20
X-ring performance on a curved face seal in a poppet valve
I’m reverse-engineering a small hydraulic shutoff valve used in an industrial test stand, and I’m trying to understand whether the face-sealing setup for the poppet is causing a recurring internal leak. The poppet uses... read more
L
M
1
399
Dec 22
Laser Cutting/Die Cutting for PP Parts
Hello, I have a small PP part with a thickness of 1.2mm. My initial idea was to manufacture these parts using laser cutting or die cutting, but I haven't seen these manufacturing methods among... read more
i
1
424
Dec 11
Shrink-fitting a thin stainless sleeve into a thick steel housing
Hi! I’m working on a shrink-fit joint where a thin-walled 304 stainless sleeve is installed into a bored pocket in a much larger 4140 steel housing. The sleeve carries only light axial loads, but... read more
H
N
6
281
Dec 29