select
navigate
switch tabs
Esc close

Design adjustments for workholding in CNC machining

0
T
6

Hi! I need advice on optimizing the design of a part that will be CNC machined for workholding. The part is an aluminum bracket with several cutouts, about 150 mm long and 50 mm wide, with tight tolerances on critical faces. The main challenge is securely clamping it without distorting the part or risking movement during machining. Currently, I’m considering adding clamping tabs or temporary holes for fixturing, but I’m not sure about the best placement to minimize post-machining cleanup while keeping everything stable. The cutouts are spread out, leaving the edges mostly linear and intact. I was thinking of adding tabs on the sides, but I’m worried they might introduce some bending when I clamp down.

Solved by Anthony

Put them on the tabs, away from the required part edges. The final cuts remove the tabs. If you’re making only one, you can simply clamp on the tabs, of course. But a screw-clamped fixture would be better if you’ve several to do. If you’re doing this on a 3-axis machine, it’ll need a few setups. If you can get it onto a 4-axis machine and you have the volume to justify the option to make a fixture to mount it to, one setup is feasible.

    • T

      Hi! I need advice on optimizing the design of a part that will be CNC machined for workholding. The part is an aluminum bracket with several cutouts, about 150 mm long and 50 mm wide, with tight tolerances on critical faces. The main challenge is securely clamping it without distorting the part or risking movement during machining. Currently, I’m considering adding clamping tabs or temporary holes for fixturing, but I’m not sure about the best placement to minimize post-machining cleanup while keeping everything stable. The cutouts are spread out, leaving the edges mostly linear and intact. I was thinking of adding tabs on the sides, but I’m worried they might introduce some bending when I clamp down.

      0
    • A

      Keep away from the big hole, there’s a serious lack of stability around there for clamping. Tabs on the sides or ends are generally a good choice, but you need to keep them thick enough to resist flexing during clamping – and clamp down to a flat surface. In this case, I suggest tabs like this:

      0
      Reply
      • T
        Anthony

        That makes sense. If I add fixturing holes, how can I ensure they don’t interfere with the cutting paths or create additional machining challenges?

        0
        Reply
      • A
        Theodore

        Put them on the tabs, away from the required part edges. The final cuts remove the tabs. If you’re making only one, you can simply clamp on the tabs, of course. But a screw-clamped fixture would be better if you’ve several to do. If you’re doing this on a 3-axis machine, it’ll need a few setups. If you can get it onto a 4-axis machine and you have the volume to justify the option to make a fixture to mount it to, one setup is feasible.

        0
        Reply
      • T
        Anthony

        OK, that sounds good. Putting this onto a custom support with sacrificial areas at the tab cutoffs seems sensible, to allow the tabs to be machined fully off at the last. My volumes should justify the 4-axis with a custom mount type of setup.

        0
        Reply
      • A
        Theodore

        Absolutely. Machine the fixture plate with mount holes, maybe even some location dowels at the periphery—better than relying on clamping screws for precise position. That ensures good re-alignment if it’s a 2 stage setup. Use the soft jaws for roughing, then transition to internal clamps or vacuum fixtures for finishing. That way, you maintain the tolerances without adding much cleanup.

        0
        Reply
Design adjustments for workholding in CNC machining
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
DFM check: Is this part a “nightmare” to machine?
Hi! Designing a custom housing for a prototype. I’ve got features on all six sides, and I’m realizing this is going to need a ton of CNC setups. In your experience, is it better... read more
J
0
7
Robust actuator-to-brake pedal joint for angled, high-force actuation
hi, i am designing a push-rod connection between a linear actuator and a vehicle brake pedal for a durability test setup. The actuator can apply 750 N, and the pedal rotates through its travel,... read more
f
H
W
12
126
Mar 16
Flatness GD&T for 6061 plates
For a mounting plate for a precision sensor (about 200 mm × 200 mm) I was going to call out a flatness of 0.05 mm, but my senior engineer says that’s overkill and will double the machining... read more
K
E
U
3
287
Mar 14
ISO 2768-mK vs specific tolerances
Hey guys, I’m getting some pushback from our shop lead. I’ve been dimensioning every single feature on a new manifold block because I’m paranoid about fitment, but he says the drawing is "unreadable" and... read more
l
P
2
361
Mar 14
Thermal expansion modelling for a braced rectangular steel tank
hi, for a welded steel coolant reservoir for a test stand - 4 m × 2 m × 1.5 m with internal bracing I need to account for thermal expansion. Fluid runs at 80–90... read more
B
Q
L
2
783
Feb 04