select
navigate
switch tabs
Esc close

Do low-tolerance features need to be dimensioned on drawings?

0
T
2

Hello, I’m working on a project that needs a lot of precision, and I’ve always thought parts should be fully reproducible from the technical drawings alone, without needing a 3D CAD file. Lately, though, I’ve heard that even low-tolerance features need to be dimensioned on the drawings. Is it normal to include those dimensions, and how does that affect the manufacturing process? Just trying to make sure my drawings give all the info needed for accurate production. Thanks, Tamir

Solved by Mattias

Hi! Yeah, over the last few years, there’s definitely been a shift from relying mostly on printed drawings to making CAD the go-to source. With how advanced CAD and MBD are now, a lot of the key info, like dimensions and tolerances, is embedded right in the model itself. It’s making traditional drawings more of a backup or reference. We’re seeing more drawings auto-generated from the 3D models, but really, the digital file holds everything you need these days.

    • T

      Hello, I’m working on a project that needs a lot of precision, and I’ve always thought parts should be fully reproducible from the technical drawings alone, without needing a 3D CAD file. Lately, though, I’ve heard that even low-tolerance features need to be dimensioned on the drawings. Is it normal to include those dimensions, and how does that affect the manufacturing process? Just trying to make sure my drawings give all the info needed for accurate production. Thanks, Tamir

      0
    • M

      Hi! Yeah, over the last few years, there’s definitely been a shift from relying mostly on printed drawings to making CAD the go-to source. With how advanced CAD and MBD are now, a lot of the key info, like dimensions and tolerances, is embedded right in the model itself. It’s making traditional drawings more of a backup or reference. We’re seeing more drawings auto-generated from the 3D models, but really, the digital file holds everything you need these days.

      0
      Reply
    • C

      Absolutely! The whole CAD-first approach is growing fast, thanks to model-based definition and product manufacturing information. Embedding all the details directly into the CAD model cuts down on a lot of the confusion that can happen with traditional 2D drawings. It’s a game changer for more complex parts, where the 3D model gives a much clearer picture of what needs to be done. We’re not at the point of getting rid of 2D drawings just yet, but it’s heading that way.

      0
      Reply
Do low-tolerance features need to be dimensioned on drawings?
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
DFM check: Is this part a “nightmare” to machine?
Hi! Designing a custom housing for a prototype. I’ve got features on all six sides, and I’m realizing this is going to need a ton of CNC setups. In your experience, is it better... read more
J
0
9
Robust actuator-to-brake pedal joint for angled, high-force actuation
hi, i am designing a push-rod connection between a linear actuator and a vehicle brake pedal for a durability test setup. The actuator can apply 750 N, and the pedal rotates through its travel,... read more
f
H
W
12
127
Mar 16
Flatness GD&T for 6061 plates
For a mounting plate for a precision sensor (about 200 mm × 200 mm) I was going to call out a flatness of 0.05 mm, but my senior engineer says that’s overkill and will double the machining... read more
K
E
U
3
291
Mar 14
ISO 2768-mK vs specific tolerances
Hey guys, I’m getting some pushback from our shop lead. I’ve been dimensioning every single feature on a new manifold block because I’m paranoid about fitment, but he says the drawing is "unreadable" and... read more
l
P
2
365
Mar 14
Thermal expansion modelling for a braced rectangular steel tank
hi, for a welded steel coolant reservoir for a test stand - 4 m × 2 m × 1.5 m with internal bracing I need to account for thermal expansion. Fluid runs at 80–90... read more
B
Q
L
2
787
Feb 04