select
navigate
switch tabs
Esc close

Flatness GD&T for 6061 plates

1
K
3

For a mounting plate for a precision sensor (about 200 mm × 200 mm) I was going to call out a flatness of 0.05 mm, but my senior engineer says that’s overkill and will double the machining time/cost. The plate is 10 mm thick 6061‑T6. Is 0.05 actually “expensive” to hit on a standard mill, or is he just being old school? What’s a “safe” flatness for a general ground surface that won’t break the bank?

    • K

      For a mounting plate for a precision sensor (about 200 mm × 200 mm) I was going to call out a flatness of 0.05 mm, but my senior engineer says that’s overkill and will double the machining time/cost. The plate is 10 mm thick 6061‑T6. Is 0.05 actually “expensive” to hit on a standard mill, or is he just being old school? What’s a “safe” flatness for a general ground surface that won’t break the bank?

      1
    • U

      You’re not entirely wrong to be cautious. 0.05 mm flatness on a 200 × 200 mm plate is achievable, but it’s tight for a standard 3-axis mill. You’re talking extra passes, slower feeds, and possibly hand scraping or surface grinding if the machine isn’t perfectly tuned – as is quite often the case. Old school manual scraping is great.

      0
      Reply
      • UlrichHartmann

        0.05 mm flatness on a 200 × 200 mm plate is achievable,For details, please refer to:https://zscncparts.com/

        0
        Reply
    • E

      For 6061‑T6 at that thickness, a flatness of 0.1 mm is usually safe and inexpensive on a standard milling setup. Grinding or lapping can bring you down to 0.05 mm if you really need it, but it will increase cycle time and scrap risk. If your sensor mounting is sensitive to tilt or warping, you can specify 0.08–0.1 mm and perform a few hand checks or surface-finish checks. Otherwise, 0.05 mm flatness is probably overkill and will cost more than it’s worth.

      0
      Reply
Flatness GD&T for 6061 plates
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
DFM check: Is this part a “nightmare” to machine?
Hi! Designing a custom housing for a prototype. I’ve got features on all six sides, and I’m realizing this is going to need a ton of CNC setups. In your experience, is it better... read more
J
0
5
Robust actuator-to-brake pedal joint for angled, high-force actuation
hi, i am designing a push-rod connection between a linear actuator and a vehicle brake pedal for a durability test setup. The actuator can apply 750 N, and the pedal rotates through its travel,... read more
f
H
W
12
125
Mar 16
ISO 2768-mK vs specific tolerances
Hey guys, I’m getting some pushback from our shop lead. I’ve been dimensioning every single feature on a new manifold block because I’m paranoid about fitment, but he says the drawing is "unreadable" and... read more
l
P
2
361
Mar 14
Thermal expansion modelling for a braced rectangular steel tank
hi, for a welded steel coolant reservoir for a test stand - 4 m × 2 m × 1.5 m with internal bracing I need to account for thermal expansion. Fluid runs at 80–90... read more
B
Q
L
2
782
Feb 04
Designing holes for M3 threaded inserts in an ABS enclosure
Hi! In my design for a small ABS enclosure for an onboard sensor module I want to switch from molded bosses to heat-set M3 inserts for the lid screws. Before I finalize CAD, what... read more
A
o
1
846
Dec 23