Xometry.pro
en – EU
Knowledge & Community
Search
K
Quote & source your parts
Europe Europe
English DeutschFrançaisItalianoEspañol
Türkiye Türkiye
English Türkçe
United Kingdom United Kingdom
English
Global Global
English
select
navigate
switch tabs
Esc close

Get Instant Quote

Use our Instant Quoting Engine to easily quote and source your parts online

Get a Quote
Back
 Profile
Menu
Materials Library
Manufacturing Stories & Cases
Articles
E-Books & Guides
Free Tools
Webinars
Free Courses
Community Discussions
Create Topic
Quote & Source Your Parts
Get a Quote

Edit topic

Home Xometry Community Industrial Design Should I use gd&t or traditional linear dimensions for tight tolerances on motor mount bracket?

Should I use gd&t or traditional linear dimensions for tight tolerances on motor mount bracket?

0
E
2

Hi! I am creating a 2D drawing for the bracket of an electric motor, which requires precise specifications regarding the placement of holes and the flatness of surfaces. This drawing is for production purposes, so it must be accurate enough to satisfy the described criteria. However, I need assistance regarding the proper means of illustrating the details. Which approach is more suitable: using linear dimensions or GD&T (Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing)? What are the benefits of using GD&T over conventional methods, and what issues does it present, if any?

Link copied
Solved by CommunityMember
GD&T offers more control for complex shapes, such as position tolerances and flatness symbols. Though it can be confusing at first, it improves manufacturing accuracy and efficiency. Understanding GD&T can reduce errors and enhance drawing precision. If you are new to GD&T, I recommend starting with some online courses that explain the fundamentals. Engineering Toolbox or certain CAD YouTube channels will be incredibly helpful. Also, the ASME Y14.5 standard is extremely important in learning the application of GD&T. After learning the basics, you can practice using a CAD program to see how these symbols apply to a part and affect its manufacturing.
    • E

      Hi! I am creating a 2D drawing for the bracket of an electric motor, which requires precise specifications regarding the placement of holes and the flatness of surfaces. This drawing is for production purposes, so it must be accurate enough to satisfy the described criteria. However, I need assistance regarding the proper means of illustrating the details. Which approach is more suitable: using linear dimensions or GD&T (Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing)? What are the benefits of using GD&T over conventional methods, and what issues does it present, if any?

      0
      Reply
    • C

      GD&T offers more control for complex shapes, such as position tolerances and flatness symbols. Though it can be confusing at first, it improves manufacturing accuracy and efficiency. Understanding GD&T can reduce errors and enhance drawing precision. If you are new to GD&T, I recommend starting with some online courses that explain the fundamentals. Engineering Toolbox or certain CAD YouTube channels will be incredibly helpful. Also, the ASME Y14.5 standard is extremely important in learning the application of GD&T. After learning the basics, you can practice using a CAD program to see how these symbols apply to a part and affect its manufacturing.

      0
      Reply
      Link copied
      • D
        CommunityMember

        When incorporating GD&T symbols into a workpiece, a CAD program like SolidWorks offers numerous features that make adding these tags to a model easier. Further effective use of these tools is covered in most tutorials, so you don’t need to worry about the learning process.

        0
        Reply
        Link copied
Should I use gd&t or traditional linear dimensions for tight tolerances on motor mount bracket?
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
Thermal expansion modelling for a braced rectangular steel tank
Industrial Design
hi, for a welded steel coolant reservoir for a test stand - 4 m × 2 m × 1.5 m with internal bracing I need to account for thermal expansion. Fluid runs at 80–90... read more
B
L
1
262
Jan 21
Designing holes for M3 threaded inserts in an ABS enclosure
Industrial Design
Hi! In my design for a small ABS enclosure for an onboard sensor module I want to switch from molded bosses to heat-set M3 inserts for the lid screws. Before I finalize CAD, what... read more
A
o
1
470
Dec 23
Airtight joint between two aluminum frame enclosures?
Industrial Design
Hi, I have two 400 mm cubical enclosures from 20×20 mm aluminum profiles with glass on all sides except one. I need to connect them into a single temperature-controlled unit and keep the joint... read more
M
D
F
2
477
Dec 29
How to correctly specify standard and non-standard threads in a technical drawing?
Industrial Design
For a machined part that has both standard and non-standard thread types, what’s the best way to call out threads in the technical drawing? In particular, should I use thread callouts or full detail... read more
I
R
6
1.1k
Nov 14
Drawing callout for tight tolerance over short bore length
Industrial Design
hi, I have an aluminum housing for a small gearbox where the bearing seats are, of course, critical. I need to hold tight tolerances on the ID and OD, but only over a short... read more
A
S
4
708
Oct 31

Edit topic