Xometry.pro
en – EU
Knowledge & Community
Search
K
Quote & source your parts
Europe Europe
English DeutschFrançaisItalianoEspañol
Türkiye Türkiye
English Türkçe
United Kingdom United Kingdom
English
Global Global
English
select
navigate
switch tabs
Esc close

Get Instant Quote

Use our Instant Quoting Engine to easily quote and source your parts online

Get a Quote
Back
 Profile
Menu
Materials Library
Manufacturing Stories & Cases
Articles
E-Books & Guides
Free Tools
Webinars
Free Courses
Community Discussions
Create Topic
Quote & Source Your Parts
Get a Quote

Edit topic

Home Xometry Community Industrial Design Should I use gd&t or traditional linear dimensions for tight tolerances on motor mount bracket?

Should I use gd&t or traditional linear dimensions for tight tolerances on motor mount bracket?

0
E
2

Hi! I am creating a 2D drawing for the bracket of an electric motor, which requires precise specifications regarding the placement of holes and the flatness of surfaces. This drawing is for production purposes, so it must be accurate enough to satisfy the described criteria. However, I need assistance regarding the proper means of illustrating the details. Which approach is more suitable: using linear dimensions or GD&T (Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing)? What are the benefits of using GD&T over conventional methods, and what issues does it present, if any?

Link copied
Solved by CommunityMember
GD&T offers more control for complex shapes, such as position tolerances and flatness symbols. Though it can be confusing at first, it improves manufacturing accuracy and efficiency. Understanding GD&T can reduce errors and enhance drawing precision. If you are new to GD&T, I recommend starting with some online courses that explain the fundamentals. Engineering Toolbox or certain CAD YouTube channels will be incredibly helpful. Also, the ASME Y14.5 standard is extremely important in learning the application of GD&T. After learning the basics, you can practice using a CAD program to see how these symbols apply to a part and affect its manufacturing.
    • E

      Hi! I am creating a 2D drawing for the bracket of an electric motor, which requires precise specifications regarding the placement of holes and the flatness of surfaces. This drawing is for production purposes, so it must be accurate enough to satisfy the described criteria. However, I need assistance regarding the proper means of illustrating the details. Which approach is more suitable: using linear dimensions or GD&T (Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing)? What are the benefits of using GD&T over conventional methods, and what issues does it present, if any?

      0
      Reply
    • C

      GD&T offers more control for complex shapes, such as position tolerances and flatness symbols. Though it can be confusing at first, it improves manufacturing accuracy and efficiency. Understanding GD&T can reduce errors and enhance drawing precision. If you are new to GD&T, I recommend starting with some online courses that explain the fundamentals. Engineering Toolbox or certain CAD YouTube channels will be incredibly helpful. Also, the ASME Y14.5 standard is extremely important in learning the application of GD&T. After learning the basics, you can practice using a CAD program to see how these symbols apply to a part and affect its manufacturing.

      0
      Reply
      Link copied
      • D
        CommunityMember

        When incorporating GD&T symbols into a workpiece, a CAD program like SolidWorks offers numerous features that make adding these tags to a model easier. Further effective use of these tools is covered in most tutorials, so you don’t need to worry about the learning process.

        0
        Reply
        Link copied
Should I use gd&t or traditional linear dimensions for tight tolerances on motor mount bracket?
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
How to correctly specify standard and non-standard threads in a technical drawing?
Industrial Design
For a machined part that has both standard and non-standard thread types, what’s the best way to call out threads in the technical drawing? In particular, should I use thread callouts or full detail... read more
I
0
178
Oct 30
Drawing callout for tight tolerance over short bore length
Industrial Design
hi, I have an aluminum housing for a small gearbox where the bearing seats are, of course, critical. I need to hold tight tolerances on the ID and OD, but only over a short... read more
A
S
4
165
Oct 31
DMLS tolerances for screw holes and sealing surfaces
Industrial Design
Hi, I’m working on a small metal housing (around 120 × 80 × 40 mm) that will be 3D printed with DMLS for a sensor module. It needs threaded M3 screw holes and a... read more
C
M
4
213
Oct 28
Design challenge: rope-to-rope transfer in a small cylindrical coupling
Industrial Design
Hi, working now on a small-scale linear actuator project and need a compact coupling between two coaxial cylinders. Both are 44 mm in diameter, with the upper one hollow (22 mm inner Ø). The... read more
V
E
4
196
Oct 17
Compact linear slide – how to balance smooth travel with lateral stability
Industrial Design
hi!I’m working on a compact linear slide mechanism for a handheld inspection tool. The carriage rides between two vertical guide rails and has to remain laterally constrained while still moving smoothly along the axis.... read more
C
A
4
245
Oct 15

Edit topic