Xometry.pro
en – EU
Knowledge & Community
Search
K
Quote & source your parts
Europe Europe
English DeutschFrançaisItalianoEspañol
Türkiye Türkiye
English Türkçe
United Kingdom United Kingdom
English
Global Global
English
select
navigate
switch tabs
Esc close

Get Instant Quote

Use our Instant Quoting Engine to easily quote and source your parts online

Get a Quote
Back
 Profile
Menu
Materials Library
Manufacturing Stories & Cases
Articles
Free Tools
E-Books & Guides
Webinars
Free Courses
Community Discussions
Create Topic
Quote & Source Your Parts
Get a Quote

Edit topic

Home Xometry Community Industrial Design Should I use gd&t or traditional linear dimensions for tight tolerances on motor mount bracket?

Should I use gd&t or traditional linear dimensions for tight tolerances on motor mount bracket?

0
E
2

Hi! I am creating a 2D drawing for the bracket of an electric motor, which requires precise specifications regarding the placement of holes and the flatness of surfaces. This drawing is for production purposes, so it must be accurate enough to satisfy the described criteria. However, I need assistance regarding the proper means of illustrating the details. Which approach is more suitable: using linear dimensions or GD&T (Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing)? What are the benefits of using GD&T over conventional methods, and what issues does it present, if any?

Link copied
Solved by CommunityMember
GD&T offers more control for complex shapes, such as position tolerances and flatness symbols. Though it can be confusing at first, it improves manufacturing accuracy and efficiency. Understanding GD&T can reduce errors and enhance drawing precision. If you are new to GD&T, I recommend starting with some online courses that explain the fundamentals. Engineering Toolbox or certain CAD YouTube channels will be incredibly helpful. Also, the ASME Y14.5 standard is extremely important in learning the application of GD&T. After learning the basics, you can practice using a CAD program to see how these symbols apply to a part and affect its manufacturing.
    • E

      Hi! I am creating a 2D drawing for the bracket of an electric motor, which requires precise specifications regarding the placement of holes and the flatness of surfaces. This drawing is for production purposes, so it must be accurate enough to satisfy the described criteria. However, I need assistance regarding the proper means of illustrating the details. Which approach is more suitable: using linear dimensions or GD&T (Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing)? What are the benefits of using GD&T over conventional methods, and what issues does it present, if any?

      0
      Reply
    • C

      GD&T offers more control for complex shapes, such as position tolerances and flatness symbols. Though it can be confusing at first, it improves manufacturing accuracy and efficiency. Understanding GD&T can reduce errors and enhance drawing precision. If you are new to GD&T, I recommend starting with some online courses that explain the fundamentals. Engineering Toolbox or certain CAD YouTube channels will be incredibly helpful. Also, the ASME Y14.5 standard is extremely important in learning the application of GD&T. After learning the basics, you can practice using a CAD program to see how these symbols apply to a part and affect its manufacturing.

      0
      Reply
      Link copied
      • D
        CommunityMember

        When incorporating GD&T symbols into a workpiece, a CAD program like SolidWorks offers numerous features that make adding these tags to a model easier. Further effective use of these tools is covered in most tutorials, so you don’t need to worry about the learning process.

        0
        Reply
        Link copied
Should I use gd&t or traditional linear dimensions for tight tolerances on motor mount bracket?
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
1. Product Photography: Angle: The piece should appear as the protagonist of the story. Use low angles to give prestige, or very close angles (Macro) to show the quality of finishing, welds and gears. Lighting: Use sharp lighting on metal edges to highlight their shine and strength. 2. 3D illustrations (3D Rendering): The piece can be displayed as it disassembles (Exploded view) to show all internal components accurately. Transparent illustrations can be created showing how the piece works inside the engine or chassis. 3. Visual icons and effects: Speed lines: Behind the piece to suggest movement. Glows & Sparks: To show energy and power (especially with brake or electricity cut). Water or oily effects: to display engine fluids and brake oils.
Industrial Design
a
0
45
Mar 28
DFM check: Is this part a “nightmare” to machine?
Industrial Design
Hi! Designing a custom housing for a prototype. I’ve got features on all six sides, and I’m realizing this is going to need a ton of CNC setups. In your experience, is it better... read more
J
P
6
51
Mar 31
Robust actuator-to-brake pedal joint for angled, high-force actuation
Industrial Design
hi, i am designing a push-rod connection between a linear actuator and a vehicle brake pedal for a durability test setup. The actuator can apply 750 N, and the pedal rotates through its travel,... read more
f
H
W
12
239
Mar 16
Flatness GD&T for 6061 plates
Industrial Design
For a mounting plate for a precision sensor (about 200 mm × 200 mm) I was going to call out a flatness of 0.05 mm, but my senior engineer says that’s overkill and will double the machining... read more
K
E
U
3
426
Mar 14
ISO 2768-mK vs specific tolerances
Industrial Design
Hey guys, I’m getting some pushback from our shop lead. I’ve been dimensioning every single feature on a new manifold block because I’m paranoid about fitment, but he says the drawing is "unreadable" and... read more
l
P
2
541
Mar 14

Edit topic