select
navigate
switch tabs
Esc close

Passivation of stainless steel for harsh environment

0
F
2

Hello!

I’m working on a part that will be used in a harsh environment, so I was thinking of stainless steel 304 as a suitable material. I also would like to add a passivation finish to improve the corrosion resistance of the part.

Are there standardized grades or methods of passivation for stainless steel? What “grade” or specific type of passivation should I specify on the engineering drawing to ensure optimal corrosion resistance? There’s lots of info out there, but I’m a bit confused. Can anyone offer some straightforward guidelines?

Thanks in advance.

Solved by Joao Clemencio

Hello FSharaf,

There are indeed several standards and types of passivation.

The main standard grades you have available are: ASTM A967, AMS 2700 and ISO 16048.

In order to have a to ensure optimal corrosion I would specify "Passivate per ASTM A967, Citric Acid Method" on your engineering drawing.

ASTM A967: This standard covers the chemical passivation treatments for stainless steel, ensuring the part meets industry standards.
Citric Acid Passivation: It's environmentally safer and effective for stainless steel 304.

    • F

      Hello!

      I’m working on a part that will be used in a harsh environment, so I was thinking of stainless steel 304 as a suitable material. I also would like to add a passivation finish to improve the corrosion resistance of the part.

      Are there standardized grades or methods of passivation for stainless steel? What “grade” or specific type of passivation should I specify on the engineering drawing to ensure optimal corrosion resistance? There’s lots of info out there, but I’m a bit confused. Can anyone offer some straightforward guidelines?

      Thanks in advance.

      0
    • Xometry Engineer

      Hello FSharaf,

      There are indeed several standards and types of passivation.

      The main standard grades you have available are: ASTM A967, AMS 2700 and ISO 16048.

      In order to have a to ensure optimal corrosion I would specify “Passivate per ASTM A967, Citric Acid Method” on your engineering drawing.

      ASTM A967: This standard covers the chemical passivation treatments for stainless steel, ensuring the part meets industry standards.
      Citric Acid Passivation: It’s environmentally safer and effective for stainless steel 304.

      0
      Reply
      • F
        Joao Clemencio

        Hello Joao,

        Thanks for the info. I’ll specify this on the drawing, appreciate your help!

        0
        Reply
Passivation of stainless steel for harsh environment
Your information:




Cancel

Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
Choosing a production process for low-volume over-molded elastomer grip
Hi! Deciding between low-volume production options for a small elastomeric over-molded grip on a handheld power tool. The part has undercuts and thin ribs, and we need decent tear resistance, but only ~200–300 pcs/year.... read more
A
0
33
Jan 22
Choosing PA12 vs PA12-CF for an SLS-printed automotive cam cover prototype
hey, I’m working on a three-piece cam/valve cover for a small automotive engine project, mainly a functional prototype that will see real under-hood temperatures, oil mist, and vibration, but not long-term production use. The... read more
h
l
1
40
Jan 22
Surface Finish
I am looking to have some Aluminium samples made............without adding extra post process operations what is the best surface finish possible (um) ?
a
0
33
Jan 20
Choosing the right tool steel grade for a high-volume stamping die
hi, I’m designing a cold-formed stamping die for thin stainless-steel sheets (gauge ~1.5 mm) used in an enclosure that will see around 500 k cycles. Given that abrasion resistance and dimensional stability over long... read more
J
D
1
196
Dec 17
Blasting and anodizing order on aluminum parts
Hello! need help - am working on a set of 6061-T6 aluminum control knobs for a small instrument panel, and the surface finish is important since they’ll be handled frequently and remain visible. The... read more
J
C
1
229
Dec 09