Surface roughness in 3D printing

0
E
4

What is the average surface roughness of different additive manufacturing processes? I’m mostly interested in SLS and MJF, is there is a big difference between these two? I couldn’t find much on this topic so any feedback would be very much appreciated

Solved by Nikolaus Mroncz
We conducted experiments in-house with SLS and MJF 3D prints and we actually have some concrete data to share. We measured the surface roughness of SLS prints with different surface finishes: PA12 raw part (approximately 8 µm), PA12 bead blasted (4.5 µm) vs PA12 vapour polished + dyed black (2.5 µm). And we did the same for MJF prints and 5 other 3D printing technologies. I would recommend you to check our article on this topic: https://xometry.pro/en-eu/articles/3d-printing-surface-roughness/
    • In my experience, surface roughness can vary quite a bit between SLS and MJF processes. SLS tends to produce a slightly rougher surface compared to MJF due to the nature of the laser sintering process and the powder bed fusion technique. But both methods can achieve relatively smooth surfaces with proper parameter optimization and post-processing techniques like sanding or polishing.

      0
      Reply
      • Xometry Engineer
        TechCrafter

        The roughness of a surface depends on a variety of factors, including the design of the part, the manufacturing process used to create it and the manufacturer. Even if you select a 3D printing technology with a supposedly great surface finish, the parts might still present some stepping marks or have a slightly curved surface, causing a decreased surface roughness quality.

        You can keep in mind that the MJF process produces a less porous surface compared to SLS, and has a smoother texture. And as you said, a near-perfect poreless surface can be achieved in both MJF and SLS thanks to post-processing operations like vapour smoothing and bead blasting.

        0
        Reply
    • E
      Nikolaus Mroncz

      Do you have concrete numbers? I’ve conducted some research on this topic, and there isn’t an extensive amount of data comparing surface roughness in SLS and MJF…

      0
      Reply
    • Xometry Engineer
      EngineerNearby38

      We conducted experiments in-house with SLS and MJF 3D prints and we actually have some concrete data to share. We measured the surface roughness of SLS prints with different surface finishes: PA12 raw part (approximately 8 µm), PA12 bead blasted (4.5 µm) vs PA12 vapour polished + dyed black (2.5 µm). And we did the same for MJF prints and 5 other 3D printing technologies. I would recommend you to check our article on this topic: https://xometry.pro/en-eu/articles/3d-printing-surface-roughness/

      0
      Reply
Surface roughness in 3D printing
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
Metal 3D printing for watertight watch cases
Hi! I'm prototyping a watch case and considering metal laser sintering (DMLS or SLM) due to cost constraints—CNC machining is out of budget. My main concern is whether an as-printed sintered metal part will... read more
H
R
2
74
Mar 25
99 model kia sephia kontak termiği yapabilir misiniz
99 model kia sephia kontak termiği yapabilir misiniz kontak anahtarının girdiği yerde 3 tane kırık var onun için anahtarı tam olarak kavramıyor ve motoru çalıştırmıyor bu kırığın yapılması gerekiyor veya değişmesi gerekiyor fakat piyasa... read more
S
1
64
Mar 19
Moulding of a Concave Disk
Hello everyone, I want to make a disk of 203 mm in diameter, 25 mm in height with a concave curvature of 3.22 mm.Will this precision be respected knowing that I am not a... read more
1
68
Mar 17
Best process for small stainless steel tiles
hello, my project requires the production of small metal tiles (approx. 50 mm x 50 mm) for decorative and functional purposes. The tiles need to have sharp, well-defined edges, a smooth surface finish, and... read more
B
l
1
101
Mar 07
0.4mm text in PLA
Hey all, my part needs to have perforated text on a thin PLA sheet, and the text is 0.4 mm thick. Do you think that’s wide enough to print cleanly without running into issues... read more
A
J
2
122
Feb 17