en – Global
Knowledge & Community
Search
K
Quote & source your parts
select
navigate
switch tabs
Esc close

Passivation of stainless steel for harsh environment

0
F
4

Hello!

I’m working on a part that will be used in a harsh environment, so I was thinking of stainless steel 304 as a suitable material. I also would like to add a passivation finish to improve the corrosion resistance of the part.

Are there standardized grades or methods of passivation for stainless steel? What “grade” or specific type of passivation should I specify on the engineering drawing to ensure optimal corrosion resistance? There’s lots of info out there, but I’m a bit confused. Can anyone offer some straightforward guidelines?

Thanks in advance.

Solved by Joao Clemencio

Hello FSharaf,

There are indeed several standards and types of passivation.

The main standard grades you have available are: ASTM A967, AMS 2700 and ISO 16048.

In order to have a to ensure optimal corrosion I would specify "Passivate per ASTM A967, Citric Acid Method" on your engineering drawing.

ASTM A967: This standard covers the chemical passivation treatments for stainless steel, ensuring the part meets industry standards.
Citric Acid Passivation: It's environmentally safer and effective for stainless steel 304.

    • F

      Hello!

      I’m working on a part that will be used in a harsh environment, so I was thinking of stainless steel 304 as a suitable material. I also would like to add a passivation finish to improve the corrosion resistance of the part.

      Are there standardized grades or methods of passivation for stainless steel? What “grade” or specific type of passivation should I specify on the engineering drawing to ensure optimal corrosion resistance? There’s lots of info out there, but I’m a bit confused. Can anyone offer some straightforward guidelines?

      Thanks in advance.

      0
    • Xometry Engineer

      Hello FSharaf,

      There are indeed several standards and types of passivation.

      The main standard grades you have available are: ASTM A967, AMS 2700 and ISO 16048.

      In order to have a to ensure optimal corrosion I would specify “Passivate per ASTM A967, Citric Acid Method” on your engineering drawing.

      ASTM A967: This standard covers the chemical passivation treatments for stainless steel, ensuring the part meets industry standards.
      Citric Acid Passivation: It’s environmentally safer and effective for stainless steel 304.

      1
      Reply
      1
      • F
        Joao Clemencio

        Hello Joao,

        Thanks for the info. I’ll specify this on the drawing, appreciate your help!

        0
        Reply
Passivation of stainless steel for harsh environment
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
Blasting and anodizing order on aluminum parts
Hello! need help - am working on a set of 6061-T6 aluminum control knobs for a small instrument panel, and the surface finish is important since they’ll be handled frequently and remain visible. The... read more
J
0
26
Nov 27
Gasket material for short-term hydrotest on carbon steel piping
Looking for advice on selecting a gasket material for temporary spool joints during a hydrotest on carbon steel piping in a refinery. The test medium will be demineralized water (low conductivity, no additives), and... read more
C
0
33
Nov 26
Acrylic or pc for outdoor enclosures
hi! For transparent cover for an outdoor sensor needs to stay clear, handle some impacts, and resist sunlight - would you go with acrylic or polycarbonate? Acrylic has better UV and scratch resistance, but... read more
L
D
3
54
Nov 26
Best flexible 3D printing material for vibration-damping motor mounts
Hi Everyone! We’re designing a vibration-damping mounting bracket (approx. 150×80×40 mm) for a small electric motor housing, and we’re considering 3D printing it in a flexible material. Given the operating environment includes oil exposure,... read more
l
D
A
2
109
Nov 27
Best 3D printing material for child-safe educational toy prototype
Hello! I need advice on a small prototype for an educational toy aimed at children aged 3–6. It consists of interlocking geometric shapes (around 8–10 parts per set), with no mechanical function. I’m planning... read more
T
F
D
2
1.7k
Jul 16