select
navigate
switch tabs
Esc close

3D Printing Tolerances for Assembly

0
S
2

Hello, I have a fairly general question, but need some insights/experience:

How can I determine the optimal tolerances for 3D printed parts to ensure they fit perfectly in a three-piece case assembly? I’m considering using FDM or SLS technologies for the case and need to account for possible post-processing (e.g. painting) and material shrinkage. The case will be used for an electronic device, so precision and durability are crucial. This is a custom device that will not go into mass production, so injection molding is not efficient for a production of max. 50-70 pieces per year.

Specific guidelines or rules of thumb for these technologies would be very helpful, especially to achieve a tight fit and structural integrity.

Thanks!

Stefan

Automatically translated from: Deutsch
See original
Solved by Nikolaus Mroncz

Hello Mr. Meyer,

for precise parts, I would definitely prefer SLS. Here you can safely process parts. Even the basic accuracy is already very good. Xometry also offers free project consultation for corporate customers. You could then discuss your specific project, start test parts, try these out and change them if necessary, before you go into a higher quantity. The customer does not need to take shrinkage into account. The manufacturing process is designed to achieve nominal masses, there are slight deviations here, which can then be corrected in another run.

Best regards

Niko

    • S
      Hello, I have a fairly general question, but need some insights/experience:

      How can I determine the optimal tolerances for 3D printed parts to ensure they fit perfectly in a three-piece case assembly? I’m considering using FDM or SLS technologies for the case and need to account for possible post-processing (e.g. painting) and material shrinkage. The case will be used for an electronic device, so precision and durability are crucial. This is a custom device that will not go into mass production, so injection molding is not efficient for a production of max. 50-70 pieces per year.

      Specific guidelines or rules of thumb for these technologies would be very helpful, especially to achieve a tight fit and structural integrity.

      Thanks!

      Stefan

      Automatically translated from: Deutsch

      See original
      0
    • Xometry Engineer

      Hello Mr. Meyer,

      for precise parts, I would definitely prefer SLS. Here you can safely process parts. Even the basic accuracy is already very good. Xometry also offers free project consultation for corporate customers. You could then discuss your specific project, start test parts, try these out and change them if necessary, before you go into a higher quantity. The customer does not need to take shrinkage into account. The manufacturing process is designed to achieve nominal masses, there are slight deviations here, which can then be corrected in another run.

      Best regards

      Niko

      0
      Reply
      • S
        Nikolaus Mroncz

        Hello Mr. Mroncz,

        I will try to proceed with SLS.

        Thank you very much!

        0
        Reply
3D Printing Tolerances for Assembly
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
How to correctly specify standard and non-standard threads in a technical drawing?
For a machined part that has both standard and non-standard thread types, what’s the best way to call out threads in the technical drawing? In particular, should I use thread callouts or full detail... read more
I
0
373
Oct 30
Drawing callout for tight tolerance over short bore length
hi, I have an aluminum housing for a small gearbox where the bearing seats are, of course, critical. I need to hold tight tolerances on the ID and OD, but only over a short... read more
A
S
4
352
Oct 31
DMLS tolerances for screw holes and sealing surfaces
Hi, I’m working on a small metal housing (around 120 × 80 × 40 mm) that will be 3D printed with DMLS for a sensor module. It needs threaded M3 screw holes and a... read more
C
M
4
362
Oct 28
Design challenge: rope-to-rope transfer in a small cylindrical coupling
Hi, working now on a small-scale linear actuator project and need a compact coupling between two coaxial cylinders. Both are 44 mm in diameter, with the upper one hollow (22 mm inner Ø). The... read more
V
E
4
295
Oct 17
Compact linear slide – how to balance smooth travel with lateral stability
hi!I’m working on a compact linear slide mechanism for a handheld inspection tool. The carriage rides between two vertical guide rails and has to remain laterally constrained while still moving smoothly along the axis.... read more
C
A
4
291
Oct 15