select
navigate
switch tabs
Esc close

ISO 2768-mK vs specific tolerances

0
l
2

Hey guys, I’m getting some pushback from our shop lead. I’ve been dimensioning every single feature on a new manifold block because I’m paranoid about fitment, but he says the drawing is “unreadable” and I should just use a general note. If I just call out ISO 2768-mK in the title block, is that actually enough to cover things like hole-to-hole distances and basic flatness for a mating surface, or am I asking for trouble? I don’t want to get parts back that technically pass but don’t bolt up.

    • l

      Hey guys, I’m getting some pushback from our shop lead. I’ve been dimensioning every single feature on a new manifold block because I’m paranoid about fitment, but he says the drawing is “unreadable” and I should just use a general note. If I just call out ISO 2768-mK in the title block, is that actually enough to cover things like hole-to-hole distances and basic flatness for a mating surface, or am I asking for trouble? I don’t want to get parts back that technically pass but don’t bolt up.

      0
    • P
      Xometry Engineer

      Hello Lukas,
      your inquiry is valid. When sizing your components and assigning tolerances, the primary consideration is to ensure the functionality of your parts. For this, the Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing (GD&T) method is the most recognized for implementing functionality-based tolerances, such as flatness, coaxiality, parallelism, positioning, and more.

      You can access more detailed information on the Xometry.pro platform, in many articles, like:

      Standard Tolerances in Manufacturing: ISO 2768, ISO 286, and GD&T

      eBook: Mastering Tolerances for Machined Parts

      However, your shop supervisor is correct: over-tolerancing is frowned upon and can significantly inflate your costs without enhancing functionality or quality. It’s advisable to use the standard general tolerances, as outlined by ISO 2768. This standard sets the tolerances for linear dimensions, radii and chamfers, angular dimensions, and also form and position tolerances: straightness, flatness, perpendicularity, symmetry, runout. And for all of these, with ranges depending on the dimensions. For what is not covered by these general tolerances, you can then apply fitting tolerances (ISO 286) or GD&T tolerances.

      I hope this information is helpful.
      Have a wonderful day!
      Pierre-Yves

      1
      Reply
      1
    • For details, please refer to:https://zscncparts.com/

      0
      Reply
ISO 2768-mK vs specific tolerances
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
DFM check: Is this part a “nightmare” to machine?
Hi! Designing a custom housing for a prototype. I’ve got features on all six sides, and I’m realizing this is going to need a ton of CNC setups. In your experience, is it better... read more
J
P
12
60
Apr 05
Robust actuator-to-brake pedal joint for angled, high-force actuation
hi, i am designing a push-rod connection between a linear actuator and a vehicle brake pedal for a durability test setup. The actuator can apply 750 N, and the pedal rotates through its travel,... read more
f
H
W
12
249
Mar 16
Flatness GD&T for 6061 plates
For a mounting plate for a precision sensor (about 200 mm × 200 mm) I was going to call out a flatness of 0.05 mm, but my senior engineer says that’s overkill and will double the machining... read more
K
E
U
3
469
Mar 14
Thermal expansion modelling for a braced rectangular steel tank
hi, for a welded steel coolant reservoir for a test stand - 4 m × 2 m × 1.5 m with internal bracing I need to account for thermal expansion. Fluid runs at 80–90... read more
B
Q
L
2
1.0k
Feb 04