select
navigate
switch tabs
Esc close

MJF material with the best low-temp resistance

1
J
4

Hello, I need to produce a small housing component for an outdoor sensor unit. I thought MJF could be a good fit for prototyping and potentially low-volume production. The part needs to handle exposure to sub-zero temperatures (down to -20 °C) without becoming brittle while retaining a bit of flexibility for snap-fit assembly. Among the available MJF materials, which one offers the best low-temperature performance combined with slight ductility?

    • J

      Hello, I need to produce a small housing component for an outdoor sensor unit. I thought MJF could be a good fit for prototyping and potentially low-volume production. The part needs to handle exposure to sub-zero temperatures (down to -20 °C) without becoming brittle while retaining a bit of flexibility for snap-fit assembly. Among the available MJF materials, which one offers the best low-temperature performance combined with slight ductility?

      1
    • Top Recommendation: HP 3D High Reusability PA 11
      Low-Temperature Toughness
      PA11’s molecular chain exhibits greater flexibility than PA12, delivering superior impact resistance at -20°C to prevent brittle fractures. Despite its higher glass transition temperature (~46°C) compared to PA12, empirical tests confirm retained ductility in subzero conditions.
      Snap-Fit Compatibility
      With 5-10% elongation at break, PA11 allows elastic deformation for snap-fit assemblies. While its yield strength (~45 MPa) is slightly lower than PA12, structural optimizations (e.g., reinforcing ribs) can compensate.
      Environmental Resistance
      Inherently moisture-resistant and UV-stable for outdoor use. For extreme weathering, post-process UV-protective coatings are recommended.
      Manufacturing Feasibility
      PA11 is fully compatible with MJF systems, achieving comparable dimensional accuracy (±0.3% tolerance) to PA12, ideal for intricate housing geometries.

      Alternative: TPU (Thermoplastic Polyurethane)
      Pros:
      Exceptional flexibility (>300% elongation at break), maintaining elasticity down to -40°C.
      Cons:
      Lower rigidity (Shore 80A-95A) may compromise structural load-bearing. Surface prone to dust adhesion; anti-fouling coatings are advised.

      Non-Recommended Materials
      PA12: Impact strength drops ~40% at -20°C; snap-fit joints risk fatigue failure.
      PA12 GB (Glass-Beefed): Glass fibers exacerbate brittleness in cold environments; only suitable for rigid, non-snap components.

      Validation Protocol
      Prototype Testing:
      Freeze PA11 snap-fit samples at -20°C for 24 hours, followed by:

      Impact testing (e.g., ASTM D256 Izod/drop weight).
      10+ snap assembly/disassembly cycles.
      Post-Processing:

      Vapor polishing for surface sealing.
      Annealing (80°C/2hr) to relieve residual stresses and enhance thermal stability.

      Conclusion: HP PA11 optimally balances low-temperature toughness and snap-fit functionality for MJF-printed housings. TPU is viable only if extreme flexibility outweighs rigidity requirements. Prioritize PA11 prototyping to validate performance under operational conditions.

      Let me know if you need further refinements! 😊

      0
      Reply
    • T

      Hello, I can offer some thoughts.  For MJF, your best bet would be MJF PA12 (Nylon 12)—it has excellent low-temperature toughness and retains some flexibility. It’s used for snap-fit enclosures and holds properties in cold environments. If you need even better impact resistance at -20°C, you might consider MJF PA11 (though it’s slightly less rigid).

      0
      Reply
      • J
        Theodore Carr

        Do you know how it compares to TPU in MJF for this application? What about glass-filled PA12? I’ve seen it listed as an MJF option—would that help with cold resistance?

        0
        Reply
      • T
        J Fisher

        MJF TPU would definitely be more flexible, but it’s too soft for a rigid housing—unless you’re going for a rubber-like overmold. PA12 strikes a good balance; its brittleness is more of an issue below -30°C. For snap-fits at -20°C, it should work fine if you add tolerance correctly (e.g., 1-2% strain limit). Glass-filled PA12 improves stiffness and heat resistance, but it’s more brittle in cold temps—avoid it for your use case. Stick with standard PA12 or PA11. If possible, print a test piece and cold-soak it to check snap-fit performance before committing to production.

        0
        Reply
MJF material with the best low-temp resistance
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
Polyjet for clear wearable casings
Has anyone here used Polyjet for transparent consumer electronics casings? I’m designing a small wearable device that needs a clear front cover to show internal LEDs and sensors. I know polyjet can do translucent... read more
P
0
43
Sep 16
Reliable nylon for 3D-printed living hinges?
Hi, I’m designing snap-fit battery enclosures for a wearable device with living hinges that need to survive ~200 cycles without cracking. My unfilled nylon prints sometimes crack at the hinge line even after annealing.... read more
F
V
4
70
Sep 17
Choosing material for high-temp, high-pressure reheater tubes
Hi everyone! I’m working on reheater tubes for an ultra-supercritical boiler operating around 700 °C and 28 MPa. I’m evaluating Inconel 617, 740H, Alloy 263, and Super 304H for their high-temp creep strength, oxidation resistance, and... read more
J
C
4
443
Sep 03
Best 3D printing material for child-safe educational toy prototype
Hello! I need advice on a small prototype for an educational toy aimed at children aged 3–6. It consists of interlocking geometric shapes (around 8–10 parts per set), with no mechanical function. I’m planning... read more
T
F
D
2
689
Jul 16
Alodine coating enough for avionics enclosures?
Hi there, my project is a CNC machined enclosure in 6061-T6 aluminum for an avionics module that’ll be mounted in a wing compartment exposed to temperature swings, some humidity, but not direct salt spray.... read more
G
j
R
2
685
Jul 15