select
navigate
switch tabs
Esc close

Optimal shore hardness for snap-fits in electrical housing

0
M
1

Hello, I’m designing snap-fit features for a small electronics housing made from PA12 (Nylon) and need to ensure the material provides the right balance of flexibility and durability. The snap-fit will be used for securing and accessing internal components, so it needs to handle multiple assemblies and disassemblies without wearing out or breaking. Does anyone have experience with PA12 in such applications, or can recommend a Shore hardness range that would work best for this type of snap-fit design?

Solved by Tim Meyer

In my experience, the Shore hardness you choose really depends on how often the snap-fit will be engaged. For more rigid snap fits, I usually go for materials with a Shore D hardness above 80, like polycarbonate. For parts that need more flexibility, like in some consumer electronics, softer materials around Shore D60-D70, such as polypropylene, are a good fit. Just make sure the material can withstand the repeated stress without deforming.

    • M

      Hello, I’m designing snap-fit features for a small electronics housing made from PA12 (Nylon) and need to ensure the material provides the right balance of flexibility and durability. The snap-fit will be used for securing and accessing internal components, so it needs to handle multiple assemblies and disassemblies without wearing out or breaking. Does anyone have experience with PA12 in such applications, or can recommend a Shore hardness range that would work best for this type of snap-fit design?

      0
    • T

      In my experience, the Shore hardness you choose really depends on how often the snap-fit will be engaged. For more rigid snap fits, I usually go for materials with a Shore D hardness above 80, like polycarbonate. For parts that need more flexibility, like in some consumer electronics, softer materials around Shore D60-D70, such as polypropylene, are a good fit. Just make sure the material can withstand the repeated stress without deforming.

      • This reply was modified 11 months ago by
        T
        Tim Meyer
        .
      0
      Reply
Optimal shore hardness for snap-fits in electrical housing
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
Compact two-axis rotation without U-joints?
Hi all! I’m building a compact gimbal for a sensor head that needs to rotate around two perpendicular axes (pan and tilt). I’m trying to stay away from standard U-joints — they take up... read more
D
0
522
Aug 08
SLA wall thickness issue for microfluidic channels
Hi, I created a 3D design for a small microfluidic part using SLA (Clear Resin) with internal channels ~0.4 mm wide and wall thickness around 0.5 mm. The function relies on optical inspection through... read more
B
c
1
71
Jul 29
Embossed vs. engraved text for outdoor molded parts
Hi there, I need to add a part number and recycling symbol on the surface of molded parts in PP GF20 for outdoor use. I initially planned to use engraved text for aesthetic reasons,... read more
T
R
A
3
86
Aug 08
Minimum hole diameter vs sheet thickness 316L
Hello, I would like to produce a stainless steel 316L bracket, 3 mm thick, cut by fiber laser. I need to include several small holes for drainage and fastening, and I’ve heard there might... read more
F
A
3
110
Aug 01
Ejector pin placement near snap-fit
I’m working on a small injection-molded housing for an automotive sensor, using PA6 GF30. There are two snap-fit arms inside (cantilever type), about 2 mm-thick walls. I’m not sure where to place the ejector... read more
M
T
5
203
Jul 18