Xometry.pro
en – EU
Knowledge & Community
Search
K
Quote & source your parts
Europe Europe
English Deutsch Français Italiano Español
Türkiye Türkiye
English Türkçe
United Kingdom United Kingdom
English
Global Global
English
select
navigate
switch tabs
Esc close

Get Instant Quote

Use our Instant Quoting Engine to easily quote and source your parts online

Get a Quote
Back
 Profile
Menu
Materials Library
Manufacturing Stories & Cases
Articles
E-Books & Guides
Free Tools
Webinars
Free Courses
Community Discussions
Create Topic
Quote & Source Your Parts
Get a Quote

Edit topic

Home Xometry Community Industrial Design Reducing stepping on slopes surfaces in 3D printing

Reducing stepping on slopes surfaces in 3D printing

0
A
2

Greetings! There is an issue with stepping on sloped surfaces in FDM prints, specifically at a 20° angle to the x/y plane using FDM technology. Parts require a smooth finish with minimal post-processing. Tried reducing the layer height, but the problem persists. Is there a way to further fix this issue beyond just lowering the layer height? Would changing the part orientation or using a different 3D printing technology help with surface quality in sloped areas? thanks

Link copied
Solved by Zuhair A

Yeah, I'd agree with Yves on this one. FDM is tricky when it comes to sloped surfaces. One more thing you could try if you want to stick with FDM is chemical smoothing. If you're using ABS, acetone vapor smoothing can remove the visible steps. Other materials might have similar treatments you could look into.

That said, SLA or MJF will definitely give you a better surface finish. MJF in particular has more isotropic properties, so you won’t see that same stepping effect regardless of the part orientation. Plus, it can handle complex geometries better without compromising strength or detail.

    • A

      Greetings! There is an issue with stepping on sloped surfaces in FDM prints, specifically at a 20° angle to the x/y plane using FDM technology. Parts require a smooth finish with minimal post-processing. Tried reducing the layer height, but the problem persists. Is there a way to further fix this issue beyond just lowering the layer height? Would changing the part orientation or using a different 3D printing technology help with surface quality in sloped areas? thanks

      0
      Reply
    • Y

      I’ve run into similar issues with FDM. Unfortunately, with parts printed at angles like 20°, you’re bound to see some stepping. Lowering the layer height helps, but it’s not always enough. One trick I’ve used is to reorient the part so that the steep angles aren’t in the z-direction. For example, if you can rotate the part to minimize the slope, the layer lines will be less visible. Of course, this might not always be possible depending on your part’s geometry, but it’s worth a shot

      0
      Reply
      Link copied
      • Z
        YvesYves

        Yeah, I’d agree with Yves on this one. FDM is tricky when it comes to sloped surfaces. One more thing you could try if you want to stick with FDM is chemical smoothing. If you’re using ABS, acetone vapor smoothing can remove the visible steps. Other materials might have similar treatments you could look into.

        That said, SLA or MJF will definitely give you a better surface finish. MJF in particular has more isotropic properties, so you won’t see that same stepping effect regardless of the part orientation. Plus, it can handle complex geometries better without compromising strength or detail.

        0
        Reply
        Link copied
Reducing stepping on slopes surfaces in 3D printing
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
Embossed vs. engraved text for outdoor molded parts
Industrial Design
Hi there, I need to add a part number and recycling symbol on the surface of molded parts in PP GF20 for outdoor use. I initially planned to use engraved text for aesthetic reasons,... read more
T
0
11
Jul 25
Minimum hole diameter vs sheet thickness 316L
Industrial Design
Hello, I would like to produce a stainless steel 316L bracket, 3 mm thick, cut by fiber laser. I need to include several small holes for drainage and fastening, and I’ve heard there might... read more
F
A
1
28
Jul 25
Ejector pin placement near snap-fit
Industrial Design
I’m working on a small injection-molded housing for an automotive sensor, using PA6 GF30. There are two snap-fit arms inside (cantilever type), about 2 mm-thick walls. I’m not sure where to place the ejector... read more
M
T
5
86
Jul 18
Adding countersinks to formed stainless sheet metal
Industrial Design
Hello, I'm working on a sheet metal enclosure (as in the image) that requires flush mounting for M6 countersunk screws. I need to add a countersink on a few holes, but the part is... read more
D
M
D
2
109
Jul 03
Fastener size choice for a through-hole in 4 mm anodized aluminum plate
Industrial Design
Hi! Designing a lightweight enclosure for a small UAV component, using 4 mm thick anodized aluminum sheets. For the assembly, I need to fasten this plate to a 3D-printed ABS bracket underneath, which acts as... read more
K
e
E
3
156
Jun 30

Edit topic