Reducing stepping on slopes surfaces in 3D printing

0
A
2

Greetings! There is an issue with stepping on sloped surfaces in FDM prints, specifically at a 20° angle to the x/y plane using FDM technology. Parts require a smooth finish with minimal post-processing. Tried reducing the layer height, but the problem persists. Is there a way to further fix this issue beyond just lowering the layer height? Would changing the part orientation or using a different 3D printing technology help with surface quality in sloped areas? thanks

Solved by Zuhair A

Yeah, I'd agree with Yves on this one. FDM is tricky when it comes to sloped surfaces. One more thing you could try if you want to stick with FDM is chemical smoothing. If you're using ABS, acetone vapor smoothing can remove the visible steps. Other materials might have similar treatments you could look into.

That said, SLA or MJF will definitely give you a better surface finish. MJF in particular has more isotropic properties, so you won’t see that same stepping effect regardless of the part orientation. Plus, it can handle complex geometries better without compromising strength or detail.

    • A

      Greetings! There is an issue with stepping on sloped surfaces in FDM prints, specifically at a 20° angle to the x/y plane using FDM technology. Parts require a smooth finish with minimal post-processing. Tried reducing the layer height, but the problem persists. Is there a way to further fix this issue beyond just lowering the layer height? Would changing the part orientation or using a different 3D printing technology help with surface quality in sloped areas? thanks

      0
    • Y

      I’ve run into similar issues with FDM. Unfortunately, with parts printed at angles like 20°, you’re bound to see some stepping. Lowering the layer height helps, but it’s not always enough. One trick I’ve used is to reorient the part so that the steep angles aren’t in the z-direction. For example, if you can rotate the part to minimize the slope, the layer lines will be less visible. Of course, this might not always be possible depending on your part’s geometry, but it’s worth a shot

      0
      Reply
      • Z
        YvesYves

        Yeah, I’d agree with Yves on this one. FDM is tricky when it comes to sloped surfaces. One more thing you could try if you want to stick with FDM is chemical smoothing. If you’re using ABS, acetone vapor smoothing can remove the visible steps. Other materials might have similar treatments you could look into.

        That said, SLA or MJF will definitely give you a better surface finish. MJF in particular has more isotropic properties, so you won’t see that same stepping effect regardless of the part orientation. Plus, it can handle complex geometries better without compromising strength or detail.

        0
        Reply
Reducing stepping on slopes surfaces in 3D printing
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
Will a 6mm dowel fit in this hole?
hello, I'm designing a part with an FDM 3D printed hole to hold a 6mm wooden dowel, but I’m unsure about the actual fit due to print tolerances and material shrinkage. The hole is... read more
b
1
28
Mar 14
Manufacturing in Germany
Hello,Does Xometry support us in setting up a workshop in Germany and producing there?
1
39
Mar 05
Should I use gd&t or traditional linear dimensions for tight tolerances on motor mount bracket?
Hi! I am creating a 2D drawing for the bracket of an electric motor, which requires precise specifications regarding the placement of holes and the flatness of surfaces. This drawing is for production purposes,... read more
E
D
C
2
77
Feb 03
Draft angles for master model?
hi, I’m designing the master model for a silicone mold (for vacuum casting) and wondering about the necessity of incorporating draft angles. Is it always required to include draft angles in the design, or... read more
P
R
3
100
Jan 22
Is drawing needed for modeled threads?
Hello, I have a modeled anti-backlash lead screw shown in the image below:My question is: when the thread is already modeled in the CAD file, is it still necessary to include a detailed drawing... read more
P
2
74
Jan 17