select
navigate
switch tabs
Esc close

Vapor smooth very thin parts?

0
a
3

Hi, I’m working on a project that involves very delicate, thin-walled MJF 3D-printed parts, and I’m considering vapor smoothing to improve surface finish and aesthetic quality. My main concern is whether the process could cause warping or damage to such thin structures. Does anyone have experience with vapor smoothing on parts with extremely fine geometries, and are there any specific precautions or alternatives I should consider?

Solved by Greg Paulsen

Hey I want to chime in with an article we wrote on Understanding and Preventing Vapor Smoothing Defects. 1mm is a recommended minimum because you may get some bubbling, bridging, etc. on your features. Another thing to note is that the solvent sticks to parts via condensation. If you have fine/thin features on your part and thicker features elsewhere you may find inconsistent finishes. I recommend trying one part before production to see how you like it.

    • a

      Hi, I’m working on a project that involves very delicate, thin-walled MJF 3D-printed parts, and I’m considering vapor smoothing to improve surface finish and aesthetic quality. My main concern is whether the process could cause warping or damage to such thin structures. Does anyone have experience with vapor smoothing on parts with extremely fine geometries, and are there any specific precautions or alternatives I should consider?

      0
    • Y

      Maybe, but it depends on the material and the design. If you’re using MJF, it’s quite forgiving in terms of design and can handle delicate, thin-walled features as long as they stay within general design guidelines. Vapor smoothing works well for improving the surface finish of MJF parts, but you need to be cautious with very thin sections. Areas thinner than 1 mm, for example, can sometimes liquefy during the smoothing process, leading to a torn or patchy appearance. I’d recommend following specific design rules to prevent these defects. Here’s a guide with eight tips on how to avoid issues during vapor smoothing.

      0
      Reply
    • Xometry Engineer

      Hey I want to chime in with an article we wrote on Understanding and Preventing Vapor Smoothing Defects. 1mm is a recommended minimum because you may get some bubbling, bridging, etc. on your features. Another thing to note is that the solvent sticks to parts via condensation. If you have fine/thin features on your part and thicker features elsewhere you may find inconsistent finishes. I recommend trying one part before production to see how you like it.

      0
      Reply
      • a
        Greg Paulsen

        Hi, Greg! Thanks for sharing! The 1mm minimum makes sense, especially with bubbling and bridging concerns. Testing a single part first is a great idea to ensure a consistent finish. Appreciate your insights

        0
        Reply
Vapor smooth very thin parts?
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
Adjustable brackets for 30 mm tubing – MJF PA12 vs CNC POM for strength and stability?
I’m developing a set of adjustable brackets to secure 30 mm diameter aluminum tubing in a display frame. Each bracket will have a split collar design with an M6 through-bolt for clamping and needs... read more
H
b
l
6
210
Sep 30
Polyjet for clear wearable casings
Has anyone here used Polyjet for transparent consumer electronics casings? I’m designing a small wearable device that needs a clear front cover to show internal LEDs and sensors. I know polyjet can do translucent... read more
P
M
4
264
Sep 22
Reliable nylon for 3D-printed living hinges?
Hi, I’m designing snap-fit battery enclosures for a wearable device with living hinges that need to survive ~200 cycles without cracking. My unfilled nylon prints sometimes crack at the hinge line even after annealing.... read more
F
V
4
329
Sep 17
Choosing material for high-temp, high-pressure reheater tubes
Hi everyone! I’m working on reheater tubes for an ultra-supercritical boiler operating around 700 °C and 28 MPa. I’m evaluating Inconel 617, 740H, Alloy 263, and Super 304H for their high-temp creep strength, oxidation resistance, and... read more
J
C
4
637
Sep 03
Best 3D printing material for child-safe educational toy prototype
Hello! I need advice on a small prototype for an educational toy aimed at children aged 3–6. It consists of interlocking geometric shapes (around 8–10 parts per set), with no mechanical function. I’m planning... read more
T
F
D
2
876
Jul 16