Vapor smooth very thin parts?

0
a
3

Hi, I’m working on a project that involves very delicate, thin-walled MJF 3D-printed parts, and I’m considering vapor smoothing to improve surface finish and aesthetic quality. My main concern is whether the process could cause warping or damage to such thin structures. Does anyone have experience with vapor smoothing on parts with extremely fine geometries, and are there any specific precautions or alternatives I should consider?

    • a

      Hi, I’m working on a project that involves very delicate, thin-walled MJF 3D-printed parts, and I’m considering vapor smoothing to improve surface finish and aesthetic quality. My main concern is whether the process could cause warping or damage to such thin structures. Does anyone have experience with vapor smoothing on parts with extremely fine geometries, and are there any specific precautions or alternatives I should consider?

      0
    • Y

      Maybe, but it depends on the material and the design. If you’re using MJF, it’s quite forgiving in terms of design and can handle delicate, thin-walled features as long as they stay within general design guidelines. Vapor smoothing works well for improving the surface finish of MJF parts, but you need to be cautious with very thin sections. Areas thinner than 1 mm, for example, can sometimes liquefy during the smoothing process, leading to a torn or patchy appearance. I’d recommend following specific design rules to prevent these defects. Here’s a guide with eight tips on how to avoid issues during vapor smoothing.

      0
      Reply
    • Xometry Engineer

      Hey I want to chime in with an article we wrote on Understanding and Preventing Vapor Smoothing Defects. 1mm is a recommended minimum because you may get some bubbling, bridging, etc. on your features. Another thing to note is that the solvent sticks to parts via condensation. If you have fine/thin features on your part and thicker features elsewhere you may find inconsistent finishes. I recommend trying one part before production to see how you like it.

      0
      Reply
      • a
        Greg Paulsen

        Hi, Greg! Thanks for sharing! The 1mm minimum makes sense, especially with bubbling and bridging concerns. Testing a single part first is a great idea to ensure a consistent finish. Appreciate your insights

        0
        Reply
Vapor smooth very thin parts?
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
MJF or carbon DLS for flexible TPU parts?
Hello, I'm working on a project that requires TPU/EPU parts for vibration damping and energy absorption, with a focus on resilience and tear resistance. I'm comparing HP MJF and Carbon DLS™ for these parts... read more
M
0
3
Oct 14
What shore hardness for vibration dampening pads?
Hi all, I'm designing vibration-dampening pads for a small industrial machine. The pads need to isolate vibrations effectively without being too stiff, and the machine runs with moderate weight and speed. I'm looking at... read more
L
C
V
2
34
Oct 07
Can I prototype in plastic before final aluminium production?
Hello! I’m working on a project where precise fit is critical, and I’m considering using plastic for the initial prototype to save costs. My main concern is whether the difference in material properties (like... read more
S
Y
1
37
Sep 24
Bead blasting impact of surface roughness
Hi, I am looking for a method of removing machining marks from aluminium parts while also improving the parts' durability. After reading another post on this forum, it seems as if bead blasting would... read more
M
J
J
D
7
50
Sep 25
What is the impact of clear anodizing and chem film on die cast parts?
Hi, I have a project making use of aluminum A380 as the base material. I want to coat some of the parts with either type II or III clear anodizing and other parts with... read more
B
D
A
4
78
Sep 10