Xometry.pro
en – Global
Knowledge & Community
Quote & source your parts
Europe Europe
English Deutsch Français Italiano Español
Türkiye Türkiye
English Türkçe
United Kingdom United Kingdom
English
Global Global
English

Get Instant Quote

Use our Instant Quoting Engine to easily quote and source your parts online

Get a Quote
Back
 Profile
Menu
Materials Library
Manufacturing Stories & Cases
Articles
E-books & Guides
Free Tools
Webinars
Free Courses
Community Discussions
Create Topic
Quote & Source Your Parts
Get a Quote

Edit topic

Home Xometry Community Industrial Design Should I use gd&t or traditional linear dimensions for tight tolerances on motor mount bracket?

Should I use gd&t or traditional linear dimensions for tight tolerances on motor mount bracket?

0
E
2

Hi! I am creating a 2D drawing for the bracket of an electric motor, which requires precise specifications regarding the placement of holes and the flatness of surfaces. This drawing is for production purposes, so it must be accurate enough to satisfy the described criteria. However, I need assistance regarding the proper means of illustrating the details. Which approach is more suitable: using linear dimensions or GD&T (Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing)? What are the benefits of using GD&T over conventional methods, and what issues does it present, if any?

Link copied
Solved by CommunityMember
GD&T offers more control for complex shapes, such as position tolerances and flatness symbols. Though it can be confusing at first, it improves manufacturing accuracy and efficiency. Understanding GD&T can reduce errors and enhance drawing precision. If you are new to GD&T, I recommend starting with some online courses that explain the fundamentals. Engineering Toolbox or certain CAD YouTube channels will be incredibly helpful. Also, the ASME Y14.5 standard is extremely important in learning the application of GD&T. After learning the basics, you can practice using a CAD program to see how these symbols apply to a part and affect its manufacturing.
    • C

      GD&T offers more control for complex shapes, such as position tolerances and flatness symbols. Though it can be confusing at first, it improves manufacturing accuracy and efficiency. Understanding GD&T can reduce errors and enhance drawing precision. If you are new to GD&T, I recommend starting with some online courses that explain the fundamentals. Engineering Toolbox or certain CAD YouTube channels will be incredibly helpful. Also, the ASME Y14.5 standard is extremely important in learning the application of GD&T. After learning the basics, you can practice using a CAD program to see how these symbols apply to a part and affect its manufacturing.

      0
      Reply
      Link copied
      • D
        CommunityMember

        When incorporating GD&T symbols into a workpiece, a CAD program like SolidWorks offers numerous features that make adding these tags to a model easier. Further effective use of these tools is covered in most tutorials, so you don’t need to worry about the learning process.

        0
        Reply
        Link copied
Should I use gd&t or traditional linear dimensions for tight tolerances on motor mount bracket?
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
FEA of a welded tow hitch
Industrial Design
Hi! Need help on a welded tow hitch for an off-road vehicle using S355 steel tubing and 8 mm plates. It needs to handle a 3,500 kg towing load with off-axis forces. In ANSYS,... read more
L
R
1
40
Apr 10
Best gear setup for a compact robotic arm gearbox
Industrial Design
Hi,Working on a compact gearbox for a robotic arm and need advice on the best gear setup. The arm sees intermittent loads, max torque at the output is 15 Nm, and I need about... read more
R
M
2
57
Apr 16
How to call out helicoils or inserts on a drawing?
Industrial Design
Hey,My aluminum part needs reinforced threads, so I’m looking at using Helicoils or possibly another type of insert if the machinist has a better suggestion (I’ll have my part produced by an external manufacturer).... read more
M
1
125
Mar 31
Deep C-channel in 2 mm stainless
Industrial Design
Hi all, working on a sheet metal design and trying to form a C-channel in 2mm stainless (304). The depth is 50mm, and I’m wondering if I’m asking for trouble with bending—springback, cracking, or... read more
E
R
M
2
128
Mar 27
Will a 6mm dowel fit in this hole?
Industrial Design
hello, I'm designing a part with an FDM 3D printed hole to hold a 6mm wooden dowel, but I’m unsure about the actual fit due to print tolerances and material shrinkage. The hole is... read more
b
1
112
Mar 14

Edit topic