Xometry.pro
en – EU
Knowledge & Community
Search
K
Quote & source your parts
Europe Europe
English DeutschFrançaisItalianoEspañol
Türkiye Türkiye
English Türkçe
United Kingdom United Kingdom
English
Global Global
English
select
navigate
switch tabs
Esc close

Get Instant Quote

Use our Instant Quoting Engine to easily quote and source your parts online

Get a Quote
Back
 Profile
Menu
Materials Library
Manufacturing Stories & Cases
Articles
E-Books & Guides
Free Tools
Webinars
Free Courses
Community Discussions
Create Topic
Quote & Source Your Parts
Get a Quote

Edit topic

Home Xometry Community Industrial Design Reducing stepping on slopes surfaces in 3D printing

Reducing stepping on slopes surfaces in 3D printing

0
A
2

Greetings! There is an issue with stepping on sloped surfaces in FDM prints, specifically at a 20° angle to the x/y plane using FDM technology. Parts require a smooth finish with minimal post-processing. Tried reducing the layer height, but the problem persists. Is there a way to further fix this issue beyond just lowering the layer height? Would changing the part orientation or using a different 3D printing technology help with surface quality in sloped areas? thanks

Link copied
Solved by Zuhair A

Yeah, I'd agree with Yves on this one. FDM is tricky when it comes to sloped surfaces. One more thing you could try if you want to stick with FDM is chemical smoothing. If you're using ABS, acetone vapor smoothing can remove the visible steps. Other materials might have similar treatments you could look into.

That said, SLA or MJF will definitely give you a better surface finish. MJF in particular has more isotropic properties, so you won’t see that same stepping effect regardless of the part orientation. Plus, it can handle complex geometries better without compromising strength or detail.

    • A

      Greetings! There is an issue with stepping on sloped surfaces in FDM prints, specifically at a 20° angle to the x/y plane using FDM technology. Parts require a smooth finish with minimal post-processing. Tried reducing the layer height, but the problem persists. Is there a way to further fix this issue beyond just lowering the layer height? Would changing the part orientation or using a different 3D printing technology help with surface quality in sloped areas? thanks

      0
      Reply
    • Y

      I’ve run into similar issues with FDM. Unfortunately, with parts printed at angles like 20°, you’re bound to see some stepping. Lowering the layer height helps, but it’s not always enough. One trick I’ve used is to reorient the part so that the steep angles aren’t in the z-direction. For example, if you can rotate the part to minimize the slope, the layer lines will be less visible. Of course, this might not always be possible depending on your part’s geometry, but it’s worth a shot

      0
      Reply
      Link copied
      • Z
        YvesYves

        Yeah, I’d agree with Yves on this one. FDM is tricky when it comes to sloped surfaces. One more thing you could try if you want to stick with FDM is chemical smoothing. If you’re using ABS, acetone vapor smoothing can remove the visible steps. Other materials might have similar treatments you could look into.

        That said, SLA or MJF will definitely give you a better surface finish. MJF in particular has more isotropic properties, so you won’t see that same stepping effect regardless of the part orientation. Plus, it can handle complex geometries better without compromising strength or detail.

        0
        Reply
        Link copied
Reducing stepping on slopes surfaces in 3D printing
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
Robust actuator-to-brake pedal joint for angled, high-force actuation
Industrial Design
hi, i am designing a push-rod connection between a linear actuator and a vehicle brake pedal for a durability test setup. The actuator can apply 750 N, and the pedal rotates through its travel,... read more
f
H
W
12
56
Mar 16
Flatness GD&T for 6061 plates
Industrial Design
For a mounting plate for a precision sensor (about 200 mm × 200 mm) I was going to call out a flatness of 0.05 mm, but my senior engineer says that’s overkill and will double the machining... read more
K
E
U
3
169
Mar 14
ISO 2768-mK vs specific tolerances
Industrial Design
Hey guys, I’m getting some pushback from our shop lead. I’ve been dimensioning every single feature on a new manifold block because I’m paranoid about fitment, but he says the drawing is "unreadable" and... read more
l
P
2
230
Mar 14
Thermal expansion modelling for a braced rectangular steel tank
Industrial Design
hi, for a welded steel coolant reservoir for a test stand - 4 m × 2 m × 1.5 m with internal bracing I need to account for thermal expansion. Fluid runs at 80–90... read more
B
Q
L
2
630
Feb 04
Designing holes for M3 threaded inserts in an ABS enclosure
Industrial Design
Hi! In my design for a small ABS enclosure for an onboard sensor module I want to switch from molded bosses to heat-set M3 inserts for the lid screws. Before I finalize CAD, what... read more
A
o
1
793
Dec 23

Edit topic