select
navigate
switch tabs
Esc close

Choosing laser, plasma or waterjet cutting for stainless steel components

0
P
2

Hi, what are the key factors to consider when choosing between laser, plasma and waterjet cutting for producing custom stainless steel components (1mm to 20mm thick) with a ±0.1mm precision requirement? Specifically, how do material type and thickness, edge quality and the ability to handle complex designs affect the decision? thank you

Solved by Greg Paulsen

I'll answer in the context of Xometry but also give general guidelines as I helped launch the US sheet cutting offerings:

Typically, count out plasma. Between fiber laser and waterjet, there is just so much more repeatability and precision than plasma cutting. There are some super great modern plasmas, but most cutters out there on the network are for fabrication, where the edge condition will require some secondary treatment like cleanup and welding. 

Laser is typically more precise than waterjet, but our manufacturing standards are amicable for both technologies. The thicker the material, the more likely a waterjet will be used (waterjets can cut basically anything). It's important on your end to specify critical dimensions that are tighter than the manufacturing standards for that process. Edge condition may also be a consideration and there are methods/equipment to taper-correct on deeper cuts. This may require a manual quote review, and in some cases, the tolerances are just not reasonable for "first cut results" with a sheet cutting process and may require machining (e.g., a 2.5-axis mill). Xometry has access to all these abilities, it just may require a manual review if you're asking for tolerances or feature sets beyond the norm for a sheet cutting process.

    • P

      Hi, what are the key factors to consider when choosing between laser, plasma and waterjet cutting for producing custom stainless steel components (1mm to 20mm thick) with a ±0.1mm precision requirement? Specifically, how do material type and thickness, edge quality and the ability to handle complex designs affect the decision? thank you

      0
    • Xometry Engineer

      I’ll answer in the context of Xometry but also give general guidelines as I helped launch the US sheet cutting offerings:

      Typically, count out plasma. Between fiber laser and waterjet, there is just so much more repeatability and precision than plasma cutting. There are some super great modern plasmas, but most cutters out there on the network are for fabrication, where the edge condition will require some secondary treatment like cleanup and welding. 

      Laser is typically more precise than waterjet, but our manufacturing standards are amicable for both technologies. The thicker the material, the more likely a waterjet will be used (waterjets can cut basically anything). It’s important on your end to specify critical dimensions that are tighter than the manufacturing standards for that process. Edge condition may also be a consideration and there are methods/equipment to taper-correct on deeper cuts. This may require a manual quote review, and in some cases, the tolerances are just not reasonable for “first cut results” with a sheet cutting process and may require machining (e.g., a 2.5-axis mill). Xometry has access to all these abilities, it just may require a manual review if you’re asking for tolerances or feature sets beyond the norm for a sheet cutting process.

      0
      Reply
      • P
        Greg Paulsen

        Thanks, Greg. That’s really helpful. I’ll be sure to specify critical dimensions clearly, knowing tighter tolerances might need extra steps or review. Appreciate the guidance!

        0
        Reply
Choosing laser, plasma or waterjet cutting for stainless steel components
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
Issues with polyurethane bonded rollers under load
Hi! Currently working on a small batch of U-groove guide rollers for a linear transfer system, and I'm using a soft polyurethane tread (around 85A Shore) bonded to aluminum hubs. The supplier estimates each... read more
P
A
4
20
Aug 19
Best fixture setup for milling and drilling mid-size batches of aluminum brackets?
Hi, I've got a batch of aluminum brackets that need to be drilled and milled on all sides with high repeatability. Has anyone designed a modular fixture system for parts like this to reduce... read more
h
a
4
31
Aug 14
Vacuum casting for snap-fits
I’m planning to use vacuum casting to produce about 50 housing units with integrated snap-fit features for an electronics prototype. The parts need to survive multiple assembly/disassembly cycles during testing. I’ve seen mixed opinions... read more
J
A
j
9
64
Aug 11
Choosing the Right Material for Injection Molding – What’s Your Go-To?
Hey everyone! I’m working on a few small-batch parts and weighing my options when it comes to materials for injection molding. I've used ABS and polypropylene in the past, but I'm curious—what materials do... read more
0
93
Jul 18
Feasibility of sharp internal corners in CNC-machined
I'm about to place a CNC machining order for a small ABS housing with some detailed features, but I’m unsure if the internal recess can be manufactured as designed. The model includes sharp internal... read more
J
e
M
2
149
Jul 09