Choosing laser, plasma or waterjet cutting for stainless steel components

0
P
2

Hi, what are the key factors to consider when choosing between laser, plasma and waterjet cutting for producing custom stainless steel components (1mm to 20mm thick) with a ±0.1mm precision requirement? Specifically, how do material type and thickness, edge quality and the ability to handle complex designs affect the decision? thank you

Solved by Greg Paulsen

I'll answer in the context of Xometry but also give general guidelines as I helped launch the US sheet cutting offerings:

Typically, count out plasma. Between fiber laser and waterjet, there is just so much more repeatability and precision than plasma cutting. There are some super great modern plasmas, but most cutters out there on the network are for fabrication, where the edge condition will require some secondary treatment like cleanup and welding. 

Laser is typically more precise than waterjet, but our manufacturing standards are amicable for both technologies. The thicker the material, the more likely a waterjet will be used (waterjets can cut basically anything). It's important on your end to specify critical dimensions that are tighter than the manufacturing standards for that process. Edge condition may also be a consideration and there are methods/equipment to taper-correct on deeper cuts. This may require a manual quote review, and in some cases, the tolerances are just not reasonable for "first cut results" with a sheet cutting process and may require machining (e.g., a 2.5-axis mill). Xometry has access to all these abilities, it just may require a manual review if you're asking for tolerances or feature sets beyond the norm for a sheet cutting process.

    • P

      Hi, what are the key factors to consider when choosing between laser, plasma and waterjet cutting for producing custom stainless steel components (1mm to 20mm thick) with a ±0.1mm precision requirement? Specifically, how do material type and thickness, edge quality and the ability to handle complex designs affect the decision? thank you

      0
    • Xometry Engineer

      I’ll answer in the context of Xometry but also give general guidelines as I helped launch the US sheet cutting offerings:

      Typically, count out plasma. Between fiber laser and waterjet, there is just so much more repeatability and precision than plasma cutting. There are some super great modern plasmas, but most cutters out there on the network are for fabrication, where the edge condition will require some secondary treatment like cleanup and welding. 

      Laser is typically more precise than waterjet, but our manufacturing standards are amicable for both technologies. The thicker the material, the more likely a waterjet will be used (waterjets can cut basically anything). It’s important on your end to specify critical dimensions that are tighter than the manufacturing standards for that process. Edge condition may also be a consideration and there are methods/equipment to taper-correct on deeper cuts. This may require a manual quote review, and in some cases, the tolerances are just not reasonable for “first cut results” with a sheet cutting process and may require machining (e.g., a 2.5-axis mill). Xometry has access to all these abilities, it just may require a manual review if you’re asking for tolerances or feature sets beyond the norm for a sheet cutting process.

      0
      Reply
      • P
        Greg Paulsen

        Thanks, Greg. That’s really helpful. I’ll be sure to specify critical dimensions clearly, knowing tighter tolerances might need extra steps or review. Appreciate the guidance!

        0
        Reply
Choosing laser, plasma or waterjet cutting for stainless steel components
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
Are vacuum-casting molds always made of silicone?
Hi! My project requires vacuum casting of silicone parts. I have noticed that silicone molds are commonly used in vacuum casting, but I am wondering if they are always the best option. Would there... read more
M
S
1
36
Feb 05
Overmolding vacuum cast parts
hello! I'm working on a project that involves overmolding for a VC (valve cover) application. The goal is to embed connectors and screws directly into the molded part to streamline assembly and improve durability.... read more
O
C
3
65
Jan 31
How to deal with shrinkage issues in polyurethane resin parts during vacuum casting
Hi,  I am concerned about shrinkage in polyurethane vacuum-cast parts during the curing process. These parts have tight tolerances, such as ±0.2 mm, and some features are designed carefully to fit together, such as... read more
J
D
D
2
71
Feb 04
Softer silicone for mold – any impact on accuracy?
Hi, looking for help with the following. Some of my functional prototypes for vacuum casting have a few tricky undercuts. I’m thinking of using softer silicone for the mold to make demolding easier, but... read more
P
R
5
73
Jan 27
Gearing
Good evening. I would like to know which 3D printing technology is suitable for small gears with a diameter of 16mm. And what material should be used? Thank you very much.
3
81
Jan 20