select
navigate
switch tabs
Esc close

Fault checking in matrices and fixings

0
M
2

Hello, I am working on the design of matrices and fixings and I am curious to know what are the best ways to prevent faults. What methods or software do you use for your projects? I’ve heard about FEA simulations, but are there specific settings or types of analysis that are more effective? Also, how do you manage actual tests to identify problems that simulations might not notice? Any advice or shared experience would be helpful.

Automatically translated from: Italiano
See original
Solved by Joao Clemencio

Hi Massimo,

Honestly at Xometry we are focused mainly on manufacturing processes and we don't do enough product development to be experts on the questions you are doing.

Even so, when designing dies and fixtures, preventing failures is crucial. I recommend using FEA simulations to predict stress points and deformations before manufacturing.

Focus on realistic boundary conditions, non-linear analysis for complex interactions, and fatigue analysis for parts under repetitive loads. There are several tools available on the internet to do it.

However, since simulations can't catch everything, it's essential to do prototype testing under real-world conditions to validate your FEA results and identify any issues the simulations might miss. Iterate between simulations and physical testing to refine your design and catch potential failures early.

    • M
      Hello, I am working on the design of matrices and fixings and I am curious to know what are the best ways to prevent faults. What methods or software do you use for your projects? I’ve heard about FEA simulations, but are there specific settings or types of analysis that are more effective? Also, how do you manage actual tests to identify problems that simulations might not notice? Any advice or shared experience would be helpful.
      Automatically translated from: Italiano

      See original
      0
    • Xometry Engineer

      Hi Massimo,

      Honestly at Xometry we are focused mainly on manufacturing processes and we don’t do enough product development to be experts on the questions you are doing.

      Even so, when designing dies and fixtures, preventing failures is crucial. I recommend using FEA simulations to predict stress points and deformations before manufacturing.

      Focus on realistic boundary conditions, non-linear analysis for complex interactions, and fatigue analysis for parts under repetitive loads. There are several tools available on the internet to do it.

      However, since simulations can’t catch everything, it’s essential to do prototype testing under real-world conditions to validate your FEA results and identify any issues the simulations might miss. Iterate between simulations and physical testing to refine your design and catch potential failures early.

      0
      Reply
    • Xometry Engineer

      Hello Massimo,
      Honestly, at Xometry we mainly focus on production processes and do not deal enough with product development to be experts in the questions you are asking.
      However, when designing moulds and equipment, failure prevention is key. I recommend using FEA simulations to predict stress points and deformations before production.
      Focus on realistic boundary conditions, on non-linear analysis for complex interactions and on fatigue analysis for parts subjected to repetitive loads. Several tools are available on the Internet for this.
      However, since simulations cannot capture everything, it is essential to perform tests on prototypes in real conditions to validate FEA results and identify any problems that simulations might not catch. Alternate simulations and physical tests to refine the design and quickly identify potential failures.

      0
      Reply
Fault checking in matrices and fixings
Your information:




Cancel

Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
DFM check: Is this part a “nightmare” to machine?
Hi! Designing a custom housing for a prototype. I’ve got features on all six sides, and I’m realizing this is going to need a ton of CNC setups. In your experience, is it better... read more
J
0
7
Robust actuator-to-brake pedal joint for angled, high-force actuation
hi, i am designing a push-rod connection between a linear actuator and a vehicle brake pedal for a durability test setup. The actuator can apply 750 N, and the pedal rotates through its travel,... read more
f
H
W
12
125
Mar 16
Flatness GD&T for 6061 plates
For a mounting plate for a precision sensor (about 200 mm × 200 mm) I was going to call out a flatness of 0.05 mm, but my senior engineer says that’s overkill and will double the machining... read more
K
E
U
3
287
Mar 14
ISO 2768-mK vs specific tolerances
Hey guys, I’m getting some pushback from our shop lead. I’ve been dimensioning every single feature on a new manifold block because I’m paranoid about fitment, but he says the drawing is "unreadable" and... read more
l
P
2
361
Mar 14
Thermal expansion modelling for a braced rectangular steel tank
hi, for a welded steel coolant reservoir for a test stand - 4 m × 2 m × 1.5 m with internal bracing I need to account for thermal expansion. Fluid runs at 80–90... read more
B
Q
L
2
782
Feb 04