select
navigate
switch tabs
Esc close

Switch 6061-T6 for 5052-H32 (bending), weight vs strength

0
K
2

Hi everyone –

I’m evaluating the feasibility of bending a 5 mm thick 6061-T6 aluminium sheet into tie-off points for tensioned stabilizing lines, considering a bending radius of 15 mm. Given the known challenges of bending 6061-T6 without compromising its strength, especially at critical points where the material is under tension, I’m contemplating switching to a 6 mm thick 5052-H32 sheet. This change aims to enhance bendability and durability but raises concerns about the weight impact. How significantly does bending with a 15 mm radius affect the structural integrity of 6061-T6, and does a transition to 5052-H32, considering its thickness, offer a balanced solution in terms of maintaining strength while managing weight considerations? 

Thank you in advance!

Solved by Greg Paulsen

6061-T6 is an excellent material with a high-performance strength-to-weight ratio, but it's not ideal for forming because it can crack in that condition and break at the bend. 5052-H32 is better suited for forming because of its higher fatigue strength and malleability. It will have different properties, so you may look into designing other features like gussets or putting a weld in at the joints for additional strength.

Even with a 3x radius to thickness this part may have risk and requires review if you choose to stay with 6061-T6. I recommend speaking with an Xometry team member once you have your quote in place so they can review the design and feedback.

    • K

      Hi everyone –

      I’m evaluating the feasibility of bending a 5 mm thick 6061-T6 aluminium sheet into tie-off points for tensioned stabilizing lines, considering a bending radius of 15 mm. Given the known challenges of bending 6061-T6 without compromising its strength, especially at critical points where the material is under tension, I’m contemplating switching to a 6 mm thick 5052-H32 sheet. This change aims to enhance bendability and durability but raises concerns about the weight impact. How significantly does bending with a 15 mm radius affect the structural integrity of 6061-T6, and does a transition to 5052-H32, considering its thickness, offer a balanced solution in terms of maintaining strength while managing weight considerations? 

      Thank you in advance!

      0
    • Xometry Engineer

      6061-T6 is an excellent material with a high-performance strength-to-weight ratio, but it’s not ideal for forming because it can crack in that condition and break at the bend. 5052-H32 is better suited for forming because of its higher fatigue strength and malleability. It will have different properties, so you may look into designing other features like gussets or putting a weld in at the joints for additional strength.

      Even with a 3x radius to thickness this part may have risk and requires review if you choose to stay with 6061-T6. I recommend speaking with an Xometry team member once you have your quote in place so they can review the design and feedback.

      0
      Reply
      • K
        Greg Paulsen

        Thank you!

        0
        Reply
Switch 6061-T6 for 5052-H32 (bending), weight vs strength
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
Slim linear guide for precise lab automation stage
I’m designing a compact linear stage for a lab automation setup, used to move a microplate (about 300 grams) precisely along a 150 mm travel. The system needs to achieve repeatability under ±0.05 mm... read more
J
i
1
211
Sep 02
Advice on plastic insert gripping an inner rotating tube
Hello, I'm designing a plastic coupling sleeve to mount an aluminum shaft (20 mm OD) from the inside. The sleeve needs to grip the shaft firmly enough to transmit rotational torque from a small... read more
P
J
4
215
Aug 21
O-ring seal design for removable marine sensor housing
Hi! My project is a small-scale marine sensor housing; it needs to stay functional when briefly submerged (around 0.5 m depth) or exposed to heavy splashes on a boat deck. I’m using a machined... read more
H
H
D
9
627
Aug 22
Compact two-axis rotation without U-joints?
Hi all! I’m building a compact gimbal for a sensor head that needs to rotate around two perpendicular axes (pan and tilt). I’m trying to stay away from standard U-joints — they take up... read more
D
b
4
1.5k
Aug 14
SLA wall thickness issue for microfluidic channels
Hi, I created a 3D design for a small microfluidic part using SLA (Clear Resin) with internal channels ~0.4 mm wide and wall thickness around 0.5 mm. The function relies on optical inspection through... read more
B
c
1
295
Jul 29