select
navigate
switch tabs
Esc close

Switch 6061-T6 for 5052-H32 (bending), weight vs strength

0
K
2

Hi everyone –

I’m evaluating the feasibility of bending a 5 mm thick 6061-T6 aluminium sheet into tie-off points for tensioned stabilizing lines, considering a bending radius of 15 mm. Given the known challenges of bending 6061-T6 without compromising its strength, especially at critical points where the material is under tension, I’m contemplating switching to a 6 mm thick 5052-H32 sheet. This change aims to enhance bendability and durability but raises concerns about the weight impact. How significantly does bending with a 15 mm radius affect the structural integrity of 6061-T6, and does a transition to 5052-H32, considering its thickness, offer a balanced solution in terms of maintaining strength while managing weight considerations? 

Thank you in advance!

Solved by Greg Paulsen

6061-T6 is an excellent material with a high-performance strength-to-weight ratio, but it's not ideal for forming because it can crack in that condition and break at the bend. 5052-H32 is better suited for forming because of its higher fatigue strength and malleability. It will have different properties, so you may look into designing other features like gussets or putting a weld in at the joints for additional strength.

Even with a 3x radius to thickness this part may have risk and requires review if you choose to stay with 6061-T6. I recommend speaking with an Xometry team member once you have your quote in place so they can review the design and feedback.

    • K

      Hi everyone –

      I’m evaluating the feasibility of bending a 5 mm thick 6061-T6 aluminium sheet into tie-off points for tensioned stabilizing lines, considering a bending radius of 15 mm. Given the known challenges of bending 6061-T6 without compromising its strength, especially at critical points where the material is under tension, I’m contemplating switching to a 6 mm thick 5052-H32 sheet. This change aims to enhance bendability and durability but raises concerns about the weight impact. How significantly does bending with a 15 mm radius affect the structural integrity of 6061-T6, and does a transition to 5052-H32, considering its thickness, offer a balanced solution in terms of maintaining strength while managing weight considerations? 

      Thank you in advance!

      0
    • Xometry Engineer

      6061-T6 is an excellent material with a high-performance strength-to-weight ratio, but it’s not ideal for forming because it can crack in that condition and break at the bend. 5052-H32 is better suited for forming because of its higher fatigue strength and malleability. It will have different properties, so you may look into designing other features like gussets or putting a weld in at the joints for additional strength.

      Even with a 3x radius to thickness this part may have risk and requires review if you choose to stay with 6061-T6. I recommend speaking with an Xometry team member once you have your quote in place so they can review the design and feedback.

      0
      Reply
      • K
        Greg Paulsen

        Thank you!

        0
        Reply
Switch 6061-T6 for 5052-H32 (bending), weight vs strength
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
Thermal expansion modelling for a braced rectangular steel tank
hi, for a welded steel coolant reservoir for a test stand - 4 m × 2 m × 1.5 m with internal bracing I need to account for thermal expansion. Fluid runs at 80–90... read more
B
0
47
Dec 22
Designing holes for M3 threaded inserts in an ABS enclosure
Hi! In my design for a small ABS enclosure for an onboard sensor module I want to switch from molded bosses to heat-set M3 inserts for the lid screws. Before I finalize CAD, what... read more
A
o
1
133
Dec 23
Airtight joint between two aluminum frame enclosures?
Hi, I have two 400 mm cubical enclosures from 20×20 mm aluminum profiles with glass on all sides except one. I need to connect them into a single temperature-controlled unit and keep the joint... read more
M
F
1
251
Dec 12
How to correctly specify standard and non-standard threads in a technical drawing?
For a machined part that has both standard and non-standard thread types, what’s the best way to call out threads in the technical drawing? In particular, should I use thread callouts or full detail... read more
I
R
6
785
Nov 14
Drawing callout for tight tolerance over short bore length
hi, I have an aluminum housing for a small gearbox where the bearing seats are, of course, critical. I need to hold tight tolerances on the ID and OD, but only over a short... read more
A
S
4
592
Oct 31