3D printing large flat parts

0
A
2

Hello, what is the best 3D printing process for creating large flat parts that is less prone to warping? This has been a significant concern in initial tests with FDM, especially around the edges. I am also looking for a finer printing resolution, around 0.1 mm per layer if possible. Would a process like SLS or MJF be better suited for this type of application? Or are there other techniques or material combinations that might help maintain the flatness and precision at this scale?

Solved by Greg Paulsen

FDM, particularly industrial FDM like running on a Stratasys Fortus, will be the best plastic 3D printing process to mitigate warping. I recommend exploring materials like ASA and polycarbonate for large, broad, flat parts. Avoid "warpy" plastics like nylon or ULTEM unless absolutely necessary.

FDM is better than SLS or MJF because the parts are built attached to a flat build plate. SLS and MJF do not have any supporting structures so broad parts can twist or flex during cooling. The sacrifice is in detail resolution. Maybe you could explore a hybrid approach in your design or splitting and assembling to achieve your results.

    • A

      Hello, what is the best 3D printing process for creating large flat parts that is less prone to warping? This has been a significant concern in initial tests with FDM, especially around the edges. I am also looking for a finer printing resolution, around 0.1 mm per layer if possible. Would a process like SLS or MJF be better suited for this type of application? Or are there other techniques or material combinations that might help maintain the flatness and precision at this scale?

      0
    • Xometry Engineer

      FDM, particularly industrial FDM like running on a Stratasys Fortus, will be the best plastic 3D printing process to mitigate warping. I recommend exploring materials like ASA and polycarbonate for large, broad, flat parts. Avoid “warpy” plastics like nylon or ULTEM unless absolutely necessary.

      FDM is better than SLS or MJF because the parts are built attached to a flat build plate. SLS and MJF do not have any supporting structures so broad parts can twist or flex during cooling. The sacrifice is in detail resolution. Maybe you could explore a hybrid approach in your design or splitting and assembling to achieve your results.

      0
      Reply
      • A
        Greg Paulsen

        Thanks, Greg! That’s super helpful. Appreciate the insights!

        0
        Reply
3D printing large flat parts
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
99 model kia sephia kontak termiği yapabilir misiniz
99 model kia sephia kontak termiği yapabilir misiniz kontak anahtarının girdiği yerde 3 tane kırık var onun için anahtarı tam olarak kavramıyor ve motoru çalıştırmıyor bu kırığın yapılması gerekiyor veya değişmesi gerekiyor fakat piyasa... read more
S
1
5
Mar 19
Moulding of a Concave Disk
Hello everyone, I want to make a disk of 203 mm in diameter, 25 mm in height with a concave curvature of 3.22 mm.Will this precision be respected knowing that I am not a... read more
1
19
Mar 17
Best process for small stainless steel tiles
hello, my project requires the production of small metal tiles (approx. 50 mm x 50 mm) for decorative and functional purposes. The tiles need to have sharp, well-defined edges, a smooth surface finish, and... read more
B
l
1
49
Mar 07
0.4mm text in PLA
Hey all, my part needs to have perforated text on a thin PLA sheet, and the text is 0.4 mm thick. Do you think that’s wide enough to print cleanly without running into issues... read more
A
J
2
64
Feb 17
Are vacuum-casting molds always made of silicone?
Hi! My project requires vacuum casting of silicone parts. I have noticed that silicone molds are commonly used in vacuum casting, but I am wondering if they are always the best option. Would there... read more
M
S
1
57
Feb 05