3D printing large flat parts

0
A
2

Hello, what is the best 3D printing process for creating large flat parts that is less prone to warping? This has been a significant concern in initial tests with FDM, especially around the edges. I am also looking for a finer printing resolution, around 0.1 mm per layer if possible. Would a process like SLS or MJF be better suited for this type of application? Or are there other techniques or material combinations that might help maintain the flatness and precision at this scale?

Solved by Greg Paulsen

FDM, particularly industrial FDM like running on a Stratasys Fortus, will be the best plastic 3D printing process to mitigate warping. I recommend exploring materials like ASA and polycarbonate for large, broad, flat parts. Avoid "warpy" plastics like nylon or ULTEM unless absolutely necessary.

FDM is better than SLS or MJF because the parts are built attached to a flat build plate. SLS and MJF do not have any supporting structures so broad parts can twist or flex during cooling. The sacrifice is in detail resolution. Maybe you could explore a hybrid approach in your design or splitting and assembling to achieve your results.

    • A

      Hello, what is the best 3D printing process for creating large flat parts that is less prone to warping? This has been a significant concern in initial tests with FDM, especially around the edges. I am also looking for a finer printing resolution, around 0.1 mm per layer if possible. Would a process like SLS or MJF be better suited for this type of application? Or are there other techniques or material combinations that might help maintain the flatness and precision at this scale?

      0
    • Xometry Engineer

      FDM, particularly industrial FDM like running on a Stratasys Fortus, will be the best plastic 3D printing process to mitigate warping. I recommend exploring materials like ASA and polycarbonate for large, broad, flat parts. Avoid “warpy” plastics like nylon or ULTEM unless absolutely necessary.

      FDM is better than SLS or MJF because the parts are built attached to a flat build plate. SLS and MJF do not have any supporting structures so broad parts can twist or flex during cooling. The sacrifice is in detail resolution. Maybe you could explore a hybrid approach in your design or splitting and assembling to achieve your results.

      0
      Reply
      • A
        Greg Paulsen

        Thanks, Greg! That’s super helpful. Appreciate the insights!

        0
        Reply
3D printing large flat parts
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
Machining deep cavities in aluminium
Hi all, I’m machining 60 mm deep, 20 mm diameter cavities in Aluminum 6061 with ±0.05 mm tolerances. Issues like chatter, tool deflection, and poor chip evacuation make it tricky, and I’m concerned about... read more
L
J
2
19
Dec 02
Laser engraving on sheet parts
hi, I am designing a series of flat sheet metal parts (about 4mm thick) that will be laser cut for a structural assembly. The design includes several mounting and alignment holes that need precise... read more
A
0
51
Nov 11
Accurate color matching in injection molding
Hi community, I’m working on injection-molded parts that need to have a consistent color across multiple production runs. The target color is pretty specific, so I’m trying to figure out the best way to... read more
M
D
1
66
Nov 05
3D printed molds for lost wax casting
Hi! As part of my latest jewelry project, I'm evaluating the feasibility of utilizing 3D printed molds for lost wax casting. I’m aiming to produce intricate designs with fine details, typically in sterling silver... read more
D
1
68
Nov 05
Machining parts with concentricity requirements
Hi everyone! For an assembly with tight concentricity requirements, I've run into issues caused by stacked tolerances during assembly. Does anyone have tips for specifying concentricity in such cases? Is it better to define... read more
M
M
l
2
90
Oct 23