3D printing large flat parts

0
A
2

Hello, what is the best 3D printing process for creating large flat parts that is less prone to warping? This has been a significant concern in initial tests with FDM, especially around the edges. I am also looking for a finer printing resolution, around 0.1 mm per layer if possible. Would a process like SLS or MJF be better suited for this type of application? Or are there other techniques or material combinations that might help maintain the flatness and precision at this scale?

Solved by Greg Paulsen

FDM, particularly industrial FDM like running on a Stratasys Fortus, will be the best plastic 3D printing process to mitigate warping. I recommend exploring materials like ASA and polycarbonate for large, broad, flat parts. Avoid "warpy" plastics like nylon or ULTEM unless absolutely necessary.

FDM is better than SLS or MJF because the parts are built attached to a flat build plate. SLS and MJF do not have any supporting structures so broad parts can twist or flex during cooling. The sacrifice is in detail resolution. Maybe you could explore a hybrid approach in your design or splitting and assembling to achieve your results.

    • A

      Hello, what is the best 3D printing process for creating large flat parts that is less prone to warping? This has been a significant concern in initial tests with FDM, especially around the edges. I am also looking for a finer printing resolution, around 0.1 mm per layer if possible. Would a process like SLS or MJF be better suited for this type of application? Or are there other techniques or material combinations that might help maintain the flatness and precision at this scale?

      0
    • Xometry Engineer

      FDM, particularly industrial FDM like running on a Stratasys Fortus, will be the best plastic 3D printing process to mitigate warping. I recommend exploring materials like ASA and polycarbonate for large, broad, flat parts. Avoid “warpy” plastics like nylon or ULTEM unless absolutely necessary.

      FDM is better than SLS or MJF because the parts are built attached to a flat build plate. SLS and MJF do not have any supporting structures so broad parts can twist or flex during cooling. The sacrifice is in detail resolution. Maybe you could explore a hybrid approach in your design or splitting and assembling to achieve your results.

      0
      Reply
      • A
        Greg Paulsen

        Thanks, Greg! That’s super helpful. Appreciate the insights!

        1
        Reply
        1
3D printing large flat parts
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
3D printing detailed miniatures new
I am looking for the best 3D printing option to produce highly detailed miniatures for a tabletop game. The parts range from 30 mm to 50 mm in height and include intricate details like... read more
E
0
0
Dec 13
Best layer height for lattice lamp design with PLA
Hi! I’m designing a lamp and exploring FDM 3D printing with PLA for the first time. The design includes both fine and textured finishes, and I’m trying to decide on the best approach to... read more
G
p
D
3
43
Dec 09
Machining deep cavities in aluminium
Hi all, I’m machining 60 mm deep, 20 mm diameter cavities in Aluminum 6061 with ±0.05 mm tolerances. Issues like chatter, tool deflection, and poor chip evacuation make it tricky, and I’m concerned about... read more
L
J
3
91
Dec 09
Laser engraving on sheet parts
hi, I am designing a series of flat sheet metal parts (about 4mm thick) that will be laser cut for a structural assembly. The design includes several mounting and alignment holes that need precise... read more
A
0
100
Nov 11
Accurate color matching in injection molding
Hi community, I’m working on injection-molded parts that need to have a consistent color across multiple production runs. The target color is pretty specific, so I’m trying to figure out the best way to... read more
M
D
1
115
Nov 05