select
navigate
switch tabs
Esc close

3D printing large flat parts

0
A
2

Hello, what is the best 3D printing process for creating large flat parts that is less prone to warping? This has been a significant concern in initial tests with FDM, especially around the edges. I am also looking for a finer printing resolution, around 0.1 mm per layer if possible. Would a process like SLS or MJF be better suited for this type of application? Or are there other techniques or material combinations that might help maintain the flatness and precision at this scale?

Solved by Greg Paulsen

FDM, particularly industrial FDM like running on a Stratasys Fortus, will be the best plastic 3D printing process to mitigate warping. I recommend exploring materials like ASA and polycarbonate for large, broad, flat parts. Avoid "warpy" plastics like nylon or ULTEM unless absolutely necessary.

FDM is better than SLS or MJF because the parts are built attached to a flat build plate. SLS and MJF do not have any supporting structures so broad parts can twist or flex during cooling. The sacrifice is in detail resolution. Maybe you could explore a hybrid approach in your design or splitting and assembling to achieve your results.

    • A

      Hello, what is the best 3D printing process for creating large flat parts that is less prone to warping? This has been a significant concern in initial tests with FDM, especially around the edges. I am also looking for a finer printing resolution, around 0.1 mm per layer if possible. Would a process like SLS or MJF be better suited for this type of application? Or are there other techniques or material combinations that might help maintain the flatness and precision at this scale?

      0
    • Xometry Engineer

      FDM, particularly industrial FDM like running on a Stratasys Fortus, will be the best plastic 3D printing process to mitigate warping. I recommend exploring materials like ASA and polycarbonate for large, broad, flat parts. Avoid “warpy” plastics like nylon or ULTEM unless absolutely necessary.

      FDM is better than SLS or MJF because the parts are built attached to a flat build plate. SLS and MJF do not have any supporting structures so broad parts can twist or flex during cooling. The sacrifice is in detail resolution. Maybe you could explore a hybrid approach in your design or splitting and assembling to achieve your results.

      0
      Reply
      • A
        Greg Paulsen

        Thanks, Greg! That’s super helpful. Appreciate the insights!

        0
        Reply
3D printing large flat parts
Your information:




Cancel

Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
Selecting the Molding Process for a GSXR 1000 Half-handlebar
Hello, I am currently working on the design/manufacture of a half-handlebar for a sports motorcycle (GSXR 1000). What is the best type of process that I could establish for the manufacture of the handlebar... read more
0
10
Feb 13
Laser cutting pc panels for machine safety enclosures
Hi, I’m producing clear polycarbonate panels for a machine safety enclosure, cut from 4 mm sheet with small mounting holes and tight internal radii. Optical clarity and edge integrity matter more than cosmetics. From... read more
L
R
1
67
Feb 04
Printing a 3D Model Purchased from a Third Party
Hello, I was wondering if there would be any issues in requesting the production of a print from a model purchased from a third party.Thank you and keep up the good work! read more
s
4
248
Jan 23
Manufacturing Wheels for Fingerboards
Hello,I am writing because I am developing fingerboard wheels as a new product within my own brand. I professionally manufacture fingerboard decks and concrete obstacles, and now I am expanding my catalogue with cast... read more
j
2
213
Jan 20