select
navigate
switch tabs
Esc close

Choosing laser, plasma or waterjet cutting for stainless steel components

0
P
4

Hi, what are the key factors to consider when choosing between laser, plasma and waterjet cutting for producing custom stainless steel components (1mm to 20mm thick) with a ±0.1mm precision requirement? Specifically, how do material type and thickness, edge quality and the ability to handle complex designs affect the decision? thank you

Solved by Greg Paulsen

I'll answer in the context of Xometry but also give general guidelines as I helped launch the US sheet cutting offerings:

Typically, count out plasma. Between fiber laser and waterjet, there is just so much more repeatability and precision than plasma cutting. There are some super great modern plasmas, but most cutters out there on the network are for fabrication, where the edge condition will require some secondary treatment like cleanup and welding. 

Laser is typically more precise than waterjet, but our manufacturing standards are amicable for both technologies. The thicker the material, the more likely a waterjet will be used (waterjets can cut basically anything). It's important on your end to specify critical dimensions that are tighter than the manufacturing standards for that process. Edge condition may also be a consideration and there are methods/equipment to taper-correct on deeper cuts. This may require a manual quote review, and in some cases, the tolerances are just not reasonable for "first cut results" with a sheet cutting process and may require machining (e.g., a 2.5-axis mill). Xometry has access to all these abilities, it just may require a manual review if you're asking for tolerances or feature sets beyond the norm for a sheet cutting process.

    • P

      Hi, what are the key factors to consider when choosing between laser, plasma and waterjet cutting for producing custom stainless steel components (1mm to 20mm thick) with a ±0.1mm precision requirement? Specifically, how do material type and thickness, edge quality and the ability to handle complex designs affect the decision? thank you

      0
    • Xometry Engineer

      I’ll answer in the context of Xometry but also give general guidelines as I helped launch the US sheet cutting offerings:

      Typically, count out plasma. Between fiber laser and waterjet, there is just so much more repeatability and precision than plasma cutting. There are some super great modern plasmas, but most cutters out there on the network are for fabrication, where the edge condition will require some secondary treatment like cleanup and welding. 

      Laser is typically more precise than waterjet, but our manufacturing standards are amicable for both technologies. The thicker the material, the more likely a waterjet will be used (waterjets can cut basically anything). It’s important on your end to specify critical dimensions that are tighter than the manufacturing standards for that process. Edge condition may also be a consideration and there are methods/equipment to taper-correct on deeper cuts. This may require a manual quote review, and in some cases, the tolerances are just not reasonable for “first cut results” with a sheet cutting process and may require machining (e.g., a 2.5-axis mill). Xometry has access to all these abilities, it just may require a manual review if you’re asking for tolerances or feature sets beyond the norm for a sheet cutting process.

      0
      Reply
      • P
        Greg Paulsen

        Thanks, Greg. That’s really helpful. I’ll be sure to specify critical dimensions clearly, knowing tighter tolerances might need extra steps or review. Appreciate the guidance!

        1
        Reply
        1
Choosing laser, plasma or waterjet cutting for stainless steel components
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
Material recommendation for axial guide replacement
Hello everyone, I'm replacing a broken axial guide component from a spindle assembly—this part sits on the Z-axis and connects the drill to the mounted machine frame. It failed during a milling op, likely... read more
B
0
22
Jun 16
hidrogene turbine
I want you to make me two hulls of about 20 cm radius and a 16 cm rotor for a turbine that will burn hydrogen with oxygen.
1
74
Jun 13
Best way to mount NEMA 17 motor on 2 mm aluminum base?
I'm working on a compact test rig where I need to mount a NEMA 17 stepper motor onto a 2 mm thick aluminum sheet (EN AW-5754). The base has to stay as light as possible,... read more
T
r
3
97
Jun 18
Sheet metal hem
Hello, I'm trying to create a hem on the edge of steel sheets between 200mm and 400mm long. I can't find any manufacturer in France who can perform such bending/rolling/shaping with a radius of... read more
s
P
1
88
May 23
Mesh accuracy concerns with FDM
I'm working on a small gear-driven mechanism for a camera panning rig and considering printing the 45° bevel gears in PETG (FDM). Tooth pitch is 1.5 mm, and the gears will be rotating slowly... read more
M
n
3
182
Apr 29