select
navigate
switch tabs
Esc close

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • T

    Hello Federico,

    Have you considered other manufacturing technologies, e.g. injection moulding? Or are you limited to only 3D printing?

    0
    in reply to: Material Information
    T

    Hello, Federico,

    How fine are the features/channels that you are referring to? Maybe you could also share a screenshot with some of the features – just to take a look and assess whether MJF/SLS can be a good solution here? 

    0
    in reply to: Biomedical device fabrication
    T
    Nikolaus Mroncz

    Thank you very much! How big are the letters in the pictures approximately?

    Automatically translated from: Deutsch

    See original
    0
    T

    Have you ever thought about Alumide? It’s a variant of Nylon, but with metallic particles. It could be a good solution if you’re looking for (relatively) cheaper parts with a metallic look.

    Another option is the nickel plating of MJF/SLS parts, which also creates a kind of metallic look.

    Automatically translated from: Deutsch

    See original
    0
    in reply to: 3D Printing – Decorative Elements
    T

    Great topic!

    I frequently use several tools for different occasions, but I highly recommend these two for Fusion360:

    • FM Gears: This is an incredibly user-friendly tool for creating standard gears.
    • Cut/Join by Component: This allows you to set specific component bodies as tools for cutting or joining.

    Both were good finding for me back in the day and now enhance my workflow! 

    T
    Luca

    I think a general recommendation can be to test your SLS parts under the given conditions, as there are many physical factors that can influence these. But all in all, SLS PA12/PA11 under the conditions you specified is a really good alternative to, for example, FDM ABS/Nylon/PLA.

    Automatically translated from: Deutsch

    See original
    0
    in reply to: SLS – Design Tips
    T

    How is the component clamped with the M8 countersunk screws? Through the threads, which are inserted into the component?

    Automatically translated from: Deutsch

    See original
    0
    in reply to: SLS – Design Tips
    T

    I usually stick to these rules, but of course they can vary depending on the specifics of a project:

    1. Wall thickness of the lattice strands: My rule is to not choose a wall thickness below 1 mm. This ensures a good balance between stability and printability. Too thin can be problematic, especially in terms of structure and handling after printing.

    2. Proportionality of the lattice structure: I make sure that the size of the lattice cells fits the overall part. Larger parts require larger cell sizes. This not only helps with stability, but also with keeping the part inside free of powder. Smaller cells are not always better, as they can make removing the unmelted powder more difficult.

    3. Selection of the lattice structure: I find that not all lattice structures are equally good when it comes to saving weight while simultaneously increasing strength. Some structures simply have too high a volume. So, I always make the decision for a specific lattice structure with a view to the specific requirements of the project, considering material use and the desired mechanical properties.

    These guidelines have emerged from my experience and have proven useful, but of course there is always room for adjustments and experiments, depending on the unique requirements and goals of each project.

    Automatically translated from: Deutsch

    See original
    0
    T
    QuantumQuest

    In general, I agree – good summary! 

    0
    T
    Andreas

    Just talked with my colleague a few days ago on this topic. We both agreed that while Solidworks has been the go-to for precision and heavy-duty tasks, Fusion 360 is really starting to shine. Its “Joint” feature is pretty comparable to Solidworks’ “Advanced Mate,” offering a lot of control for complex assemblies. And the integrated simulation tools? Super handy. The cloud-based nature of Fusion 360 really simplifies collaboration too. Honestly, with all the updates and new features being added, Fusion 360 is quickly closing any gap with Solidworks. It’s becoming a serious contender, especially for those of us leaning into the latest in CAD/CAE tech.

    2
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)