select
navigate
switch tabs
Esc close

3D printing large flat parts

0
A
2

Hello, what is the best 3D printing process for creating large flat parts that is less prone to warping? This has been a significant concern in initial tests with FDM, especially around the edges. I am also looking for a finer printing resolution, around 0.1 mm per layer if possible. Would a process like SLS or MJF be better suited for this type of application? Or are there other techniques or material combinations that might help maintain the flatness and precision at this scale?

Solved by Greg Paulsen

FDM, particularly industrial FDM like running on a Stratasys Fortus, will be the best plastic 3D printing process to mitigate warping. I recommend exploring materials like ASA and polycarbonate for large, broad, flat parts. Avoid "warpy" plastics like nylon or ULTEM unless absolutely necessary.

FDM is better than SLS or MJF because the parts are built attached to a flat build plate. SLS and MJF do not have any supporting structures so broad parts can twist or flex during cooling. The sacrifice is in detail resolution. Maybe you could explore a hybrid approach in your design or splitting and assembling to achieve your results.

    • A

      Hello, what is the best 3D printing process for creating large flat parts that is less prone to warping? This has been a significant concern in initial tests with FDM, especially around the edges. I am also looking for a finer printing resolution, around 0.1 mm per layer if possible. Would a process like SLS or MJF be better suited for this type of application? Or are there other techniques or material combinations that might help maintain the flatness and precision at this scale?

      0
    • Xometry Engineer

      FDM, particularly industrial FDM like running on a Stratasys Fortus, will be the best plastic 3D printing process to mitigate warping. I recommend exploring materials like ASA and polycarbonate for large, broad, flat parts. Avoid “warpy” plastics like nylon or ULTEM unless absolutely necessary.

      FDM is better than SLS or MJF because the parts are built attached to a flat build plate. SLS and MJF do not have any supporting structures so broad parts can twist or flex during cooling. The sacrifice is in detail resolution. Maybe you could explore a hybrid approach in your design or splitting and assembling to achieve your results.

      0
      Reply
      • A
        Greg Paulsen

        Thanks, Greg! That’s super helpful. Appreciate the insights!

        1
        Reply
        1
3D printing large flat parts
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
Laser Cutting/Die Cutting for PP Parts new
Hello, I have a small PP part with a thickness of 1.2mm. My initial idea was to manufacture these parts using laser cutting or die cutting, but I haven't seen these manufacturing methods among... read more
i
0
1
Dec 10
Shrink-fitting a thin stainless sleeve into a thick steel housing
Hi! I’m working on a shrink-fit joint where a thin-walled 304 stainless sleeve is installed into a bored pocket in a much larger 4140 steel housing. The sleeve carries only light axial loads, but... read more
H
0
18
Feasibility of using DMLS aluminum parts for pressure-test prototypes
I’m testing the idea of using DMLS Aluminum parts as pre-production prototypes for a high-pressure fluid system. These would be static housings only, not moving parts. Has anyone validated 3D-printed aluminum components under realistic... read more
A
0
116
Nov 24
Process for a low-volume stainless steel pump impeller
Hi all, I’m designing a stainless steel impeller for a small pump (diameter around 80 mm). Would you go for metal additive manufacturing or casting if you need tight tolerances on the blades and... read more
p
c
1
207
Nov 24
Minimum letter size for raised text on SLS nylon parts
I’m working on a medical device enclosure that needs raised lettering (product name and serial number) on the lid, printed in SLS nylon. The letters are around 2 mm high with a stroke width... read more
m
j
4
541
Oct 30