select
navigate
switch tabs
Esc close

Optimizing DMLS support structures for powder removal

0
E
1

Hi everyone, we’re looking to use DMLS to create intricate internal channels in a complex heat exchanger for a miniaturized cooling system in a portable medical device. Our main challenge is optimizing the design for both thermal efficiency and manufacturability. We’re aiming for a compact unit, approximately 100mm x 50mm x 30mm, with internal channels as small as 0.5mm in diameter. The material we’re considering is AlSi10Mg for its excellent thermal conductivity and corrosion resistance.

My specific question is about support structures for these internal channels. Given the complexity of our design, I’m concerned about powder removal post-printing. Has anyone here successfully implemented self-supporting geometries for similar small, intricate channels in DMLS? If so, what were your key design considerations to ensure proper powder evacuation while maintaining the structural integrity of the part?

Solved by Nikolaus Mroncz

Hey, hi, unsupported channels from 1 to 6mm are in general no problem. If it is smaller, like in your case, it could be challenging and there is no general answer possible and also it should be rated by seeing the whole design. You could also mail me directly under nmroncz@xometry.de

    • E

      Hi everyone, we’re looking to use DMLS to create intricate internal channels in a complex heat exchanger for a miniaturized cooling system in a portable medical device. Our main challenge is optimizing the design for both thermal efficiency and manufacturability. We’re aiming for a compact unit, approximately 100mm x 50mm x 30mm, with internal channels as small as 0.5mm in diameter. The material we’re considering is AlSi10Mg for its excellent thermal conductivity and corrosion resistance.

      My specific question is about support structures for these internal channels. Given the complexity of our design, I’m concerned about powder removal post-printing. Has anyone here successfully implemented self-supporting geometries for similar small, intricate channels in DMLS? If so, what were your key design considerations to ensure proper powder evacuation while maintaining the structural integrity of the part?

      0
    • Xometry Engineer

      Hey, hi, unsupported channels from 1 to 6mm are in general no problem. If it is smaller, like in your case, it could be challenging and there is no general answer possible and also it should be rated by seeing the whole design. You could also mail me directly under nmroncz@xometry.de

      0
      Reply
Optimizing DMLS support structures for powder removal
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
Airtight joint between two aluminum frame enclosures?
Hi, I have two 400 mm cubical enclosures from 20×20 mm aluminum profiles with glass on all sides except one. I need to connect them into a single temperature-controlled unit and keep the joint... read more
M
0
24
Nov 28
How to correctly specify standard and non-standard threads in a technical drawing?
For a machined part that has both standard and non-standard thread types, what’s the best way to call out threads in the technical drawing? In particular, should I use thread callouts or full detail... read more
I
R
6
544
Nov 14
Drawing callout for tight tolerance over short bore length
hi, I have an aluminum housing for a small gearbox where the bearing seats are, of course, critical. I need to hold tight tolerances on the ID and OD, but only over a short... read more
A
S
4
476
Oct 31
DMLS tolerances for screw holes and sealing surfaces
Hi, I’m working on a small metal housing (around 120 × 80 × 40 mm) that will be 3D printed with DMLS for a sensor module. It needs threaded M3 screw holes and a... read more
C
A
M
10
486
Nov 25
Design challenge: rope-to-rope transfer in a small cylindrical coupling
Hi, working now on a small-scale linear actuator project and need a compact coupling between two coaxial cylinders. Both are 44 mm in diameter, with the upper one hollow (22 mm inner Ø). The... read more
V
E
4
375
Oct 17