select
navigate
switch tabs
Esc close

Optimizing DMLS support structures for powder removal

0
E
1

Hi everyone, we’re looking to use DMLS to create intricate internal channels in a complex heat exchanger for a miniaturized cooling system in a portable medical device. Our main challenge is optimizing the design for both thermal efficiency and manufacturability. We’re aiming for a compact unit, approximately 100mm x 50mm x 30mm, with internal channels as small as 0.5mm in diameter. The material we’re considering is AlSi10Mg for its excellent thermal conductivity and corrosion resistance.

My specific question is about support structures for these internal channels. Given the complexity of our design, I’m concerned about powder removal post-printing. Has anyone here successfully implemented self-supporting geometries for similar small, intricate channels in DMLS? If so, what were your key design considerations to ensure proper powder evacuation while maintaining the structural integrity of the part?

Solved by Nikolaus Mroncz

Hey, hi, unsupported channels from 1 to 6mm are in general no problem. If it is smaller, like in your case, it could be challenging and there is no general answer possible and also it should be rated by seeing the whole design. You could also mail me directly under nmroncz@xometry.de

    • E

      Hi everyone, we’re looking to use DMLS to create intricate internal channels in a complex heat exchanger for a miniaturized cooling system in a portable medical device. Our main challenge is optimizing the design for both thermal efficiency and manufacturability. We’re aiming for a compact unit, approximately 100mm x 50mm x 30mm, with internal channels as small as 0.5mm in diameter. The material we’re considering is AlSi10Mg for its excellent thermal conductivity and corrosion resistance.

      My specific question is about support structures for these internal channels. Given the complexity of our design, I’m concerned about powder removal post-printing. Has anyone here successfully implemented self-supporting geometries for similar small, intricate channels in DMLS? If so, what were your key design considerations to ensure proper powder evacuation while maintaining the structural integrity of the part?

      0
    • Xometry Engineer

      Hey, hi, unsupported channels from 1 to 6mm are in general no problem. If it is smaller, like in your case, it could be challenging and there is no general answer possible and also it should be rated by seeing the whole design. You could also mail me directly under nmroncz@xometry.de

      0
      Reply
Optimizing DMLS support structures for powder removal
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
Compact two-axis rotation without U-joints?
Hi all! I’m building a compact gimbal for a sensor head that needs to rotate around two perpendicular axes (pan and tilt). I’m trying to stay away from standard U-joints — they take up... read more
D
0
230
Aug 08
SLA wall thickness issue for microfluidic channels
Hi, I created a 3D design for a small microfluidic part using SLA (Clear Resin) with internal channels ~0.4 mm wide and wall thickness around 0.5 mm. The function relies on optical inspection through... read more
B
c
1
64
Jul 29
Embossed vs. engraved text for outdoor molded parts
Hi there, I need to add a part number and recycling symbol on the surface of molded parts in PP GF20 for outdoor use. I initially planned to use engraved text for aesthetic reasons,... read more
T
R
A
3
77
Aug 08
Minimum hole diameter vs sheet thickness 316L
Hello, I would like to produce a stainless steel 316L bracket, 3 mm thick, cut by fiber laser. I need to include several small holes for drainage and fastening, and I’ve heard there might... read more
F
A
3
101
Aug 01
Ejector pin placement near snap-fit
I’m working on a small injection-molded housing for an automotive sensor, using PA6 GF30. There are two snap-fit arms inside (cantilever type), about 2 mm-thick walls. I’m not sure where to place the ejector... read more
M
T
5
194
Jul 18