Optimizing DMLS support structures for powder removal

0
E
1

Hi everyone, we’re looking to use DMLS to create intricate internal channels in a complex heat exchanger for a miniaturized cooling system in a portable medical device. Our main challenge is optimizing the design for both thermal efficiency and manufacturability. We’re aiming for a compact unit, approximately 100mm x 50mm x 30mm, with internal channels as small as 0.5mm in diameter. The material we’re considering is AlSi10Mg for its excellent thermal conductivity and corrosion resistance.

My specific question is about support structures for these internal channels. Given the complexity of our design, I’m concerned about powder removal post-printing. Has anyone here successfully implemented self-supporting geometries for similar small, intricate channels in DMLS? If so, what were your key design considerations to ensure proper powder evacuation while maintaining the structural integrity of the part?

Solved by Nikolaus Mroncz

Hey, hi, unsupported channels from 1 to 6mm are in general no problem. If it is smaller, like in your case, it could be challenging and there is no general answer possible and also it should be rated by seeing the whole design. You could also mail me directly under nmroncz@xometry.de

    • E

      Hi everyone, we’re looking to use DMLS to create intricate internal channels in a complex heat exchanger for a miniaturized cooling system in a portable medical device. Our main challenge is optimizing the design for both thermal efficiency and manufacturability. We’re aiming for a compact unit, approximately 100mm x 50mm x 30mm, with internal channels as small as 0.5mm in diameter. The material we’re considering is AlSi10Mg for its excellent thermal conductivity and corrosion resistance.

      My specific question is about support structures for these internal channels. Given the complexity of our design, I’m concerned about powder removal post-printing. Has anyone here successfully implemented self-supporting geometries for similar small, intricate channels in DMLS? If so, what were your key design considerations to ensure proper powder evacuation while maintaining the structural integrity of the part?

      0
    • Xometry Engineer

      Hey, hi, unsupported channels from 1 to 6mm are in general no problem. If it is smaller, like in your case, it could be challenging and there is no general answer possible and also it should be rated by seeing the whole design. You could also mail me directly under nmroncz@xometry.de

      0
      Reply
Optimizing DMLS support structures for powder removal
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
Will a 6mm dowel fit in this hole?
hello, I'm designing a part with an FDM 3D printed hole to hold a 6mm wooden dowel, but I’m unsure about the actual fit due to print tolerances and material shrinkage. The hole is... read more
b
1
52
Mar 14
Manufacturing in Germany
Hello,Does Xometry support us in setting up a workshop in Germany and producing there?
1
79
Mar 05
Should I use gd&t or traditional linear dimensions for tight tolerances on motor mount bracket?
Hi! I am creating a 2D drawing for the bracket of an electric motor, which requires precise specifications regarding the placement of holes and the flatness of surfaces. This drawing is for production purposes,... read more
E
D
C
2
124
Feb 03
Draft angles for master model?
hi, I’m designing the master model for a silicone mold (for vacuum casting) and wondering about the necessity of incorporating draft angles. Is it always required to include draft angles in the design, or... read more
P
R
3
184
Jan 22
Is drawing needed for modeled threads?
Hello, I have a modeled anti-backlash lead screw shown in the image below:My question is: when the thread is already modeled in the CAD file, is it still necessary to include a detailed drawing... read more
P
2
145
Jan 17