Optimizing DMLS support structures for powder removal

0
E
1

Hi everyone, we’re looking to use DMLS to create intricate internal channels in a complex heat exchanger for a miniaturized cooling system in a portable medical device. Our main challenge is optimizing the design for both thermal efficiency and manufacturability. We’re aiming for a compact unit, approximately 100mm x 50mm x 30mm, with internal channels as small as 0.5mm in diameter. The material we’re considering is AlSi10Mg for its excellent thermal conductivity and corrosion resistance.

My specific question is about support structures for these internal channels. Given the complexity of our design, I’m concerned about powder removal post-printing. Has anyone here successfully implemented self-supporting geometries for similar small, intricate channels in DMLS? If so, what were your key design considerations to ensure proper powder evacuation while maintaining the structural integrity of the part?

    • E

      Hi everyone, we’re looking to use DMLS to create intricate internal channels in a complex heat exchanger for a miniaturized cooling system in a portable medical device. Our main challenge is optimizing the design for both thermal efficiency and manufacturability. We’re aiming for a compact unit, approximately 100mm x 50mm x 30mm, with internal channels as small as 0.5mm in diameter. The material we’re considering is AlSi10Mg for its excellent thermal conductivity and corrosion resistance.

      My specific question is about support structures for these internal channels. Given the complexity of our design, I’m concerned about powder removal post-printing. Has anyone here successfully implemented self-supporting geometries for similar small, intricate channels in DMLS? If so, what were your key design considerations to ensure proper powder evacuation while maintaining the structural integrity of the part?

      0
    • Xometry Engineer

      Hey, hi, unsupported channels from 1 to 6mm are in general no problem. If it is smaller, like in your case, it could be challenging and there is no general answer possible and also it should be rated by seeing the whole design. You could also mail me directly under nmroncz@xometry.de

      0
      Reply
Optimizing DMLS support structures for powder removal
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
ISO 2768 fine or medium?
Hi, I'm trying to decide between ISO 2768 Fine and Medium tolerances for CNC machined aluminium parts. What are the practical implications of this choice in terms of achievable precision, manufacturing cost, and lead... read more
L
1
41
Oct 28
Any favorite underrated DFM trick?
Hello! Recently, I’ve been refining some precision features like thread depth, fillet dimensions, and flat-bottomed drilled holes to enhance manufacturability. It got me thinking—what’s your favorite underutilized DFM trick that makes a big difference... read more
E
R
1
58
Oct 21
Reducing stepping on slopes surfaces in 3D printing
Greetings! There is an issue with stepping on sloped surfaces in FDM prints, specifically at a 20° angle to the x/y plane using FDM technology. Parts require a smooth finish with minimal post-processing. Tried... read more
A
Z
Y
2
52
Nov 05
Optimizing support structures for DMLS printing
Hello everyone, I’m working on a DMLS turbine blade with some overhangs and complex curvature, and I’ve run into challenges with support structures. I’ve noticed that removing the supports leaves marks and sometimes even... read more
T
C
a
2
61
Oct 18
Curved features on 3-axis vs 4-axis CNC machine
Hello, I'm trying to better understand when a 4-axis CNC machine is necessary for machining curved features. I know that a 3-axis machine can handle some curved cuts, but I’ve heard that certain designs... read more
M
J
1
65
Oct 08