select
navigate
switch tabs
Esc close

Maximum safe draw depth for aluminum

0
E
6

Hi everyone, I’m designing an automotive underbody heat shield using 0.8 mm thick aluminum alloy 5052-H32 for progressive die stamping. My main challenge is determining the optimal draw depth for complex geometries without risking material thinning or tearing. Some areas of the part require a draw depth of up to 25 mm. Given the material properties and thickness, I’m concerned about maintaining part integrity during the deep drawing process. 

I’m looking for advice on:

  • Calculating the maximum safe draw depth for this specific material and thickness
  • Strategies to achieve deeper draws without compromising material integrity

Has anyone worked with similar geometries and materials? What approaches have you found successful in optimizing draw depth while ensuring part quality?

Solved by Marshall

Hi,
To perform a basic check you can check the limiting draw ratio (LDR) using this formula: LDR =Dmax/d

Where Dmax is the maximum diameter of the blank and d is the diameter of the punch. You can determine the blank diameter using: r1 = r2(r2 + 2H)

Where r1 is the radius of the blank, r2 radius of the cup and H is the height of the cup. Once you have the blank radius you can calculate the LDR. Ultimately, you need to get the specific LDR for the material you are using from the material supplier. If your calculated LDR falls in the recommended range indicated by the supplier, then you should be able to deep draw the material. 

    • E

      Hi everyone, I’m designing an automotive underbody heat shield using 0.8 mm thick aluminum alloy 5052-H32 for progressive die stamping. My main challenge is determining the optimal draw depth for complex geometries without risking material thinning or tearing. Some areas of the part require a draw depth of up to 25 mm. Given the material properties and thickness, I’m concerned about maintaining part integrity during the deep drawing process. 

      I’m looking for advice on:

      • Calculating the maximum safe draw depth for this specific material and thickness
      • Strategies to achieve deeper draws without compromising material integrity

      Has anyone worked with similar geometries and materials? What approaches have you found successful in optimizing draw depth while ensuring part quality?

      0
    • M

      Hi,
      To perform a basic check you can check the limiting draw ratio (LDR) using this formula: LDR =Dmax/d

      Where Dmax is the maximum diameter of the blank and d is the diameter of the punch. You can determine the blank diameter using: r1 = r2(r2 + 2H)

      Where r1 is the radius of the blank, r2 radius of the cup and H is the height of the cup. Once you have the blank radius you can calculate the LDR. Ultimately, you need to get the specific LDR for the material you are using from the material supplier. If your calculated LDR falls in the recommended range indicated by the supplier, then you should be able to deep draw the material. 

      0
      Reply
      • E
        Marshall

        Thank you Marshall, the calculation you provided seems to be for a cylindrical shape, how can I determine the max draw depth of more complex shapes?

        0
        Reply
      • M
        Esme Shaw

        The above equation was presented as a simple way to check if your material can be deep drawn. If it fails this check then it definitely won’t work for more complex shapes. For a more detailed analysis on a complex geometry, you will have to perform an FEA analysis. Alternatively, you can reach out to a deep drawing company as they will have more than enough experience to tell you if you can or cannot manufacture your part using your chosen material.

        0
        Reply
      • L
        Marshall

        As another user mentioned, you will not be able to do a simple hand calculation to check if your material can be deep-drawn. However, there are a few techniques that can reduce the possibility of failure when deep drawing difficult geometries. For example, lubrication, die design, and blank clamp pressure optimization can all help reduce common failure modes.

        0
        Reply
      • E
        Lloyd

        These interventions will all be in the control of the workshop manufacturing the part, is there anything I can do from a design or material selection perspective to improve formability?

        0
        Reply
      • L
        Esme Shaw

        Hi Esme, one thing I can think of is to use a softer material, for example, 5052-O, and then temper the completed part to 5050-H32.

        0
        Reply
Maximum safe draw depth for aluminum
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
SLA wall thickness issue for microfluidic channels
Hi, I created a 3D design for a small microfluidic part using SLA (Clear Resin) with internal channels ~0.4 mm wide and wall thickness around 0.5 mm. The function relies on optical inspection through... read more
B
c
1
13
Jul 29
Embossed vs. engraved text for outdoor molded parts
Hi there, I need to add a part number and recycling symbol on the surface of molded parts in PP GF20 for outdoor use. I initially planned to use engraved text for aesthetic reasons,... read more
T
R
A
2
16
Jul 30
Minimum hole diameter vs sheet thickness 316L
Hello, I would like to produce a stainless steel 316L bracket, 3 mm thick, cut by fiber laser. I need to include several small holes for drainage and fastening, and I’ve heard there might... read more
F
A
2
26
Jul 28
Ejector pin placement near snap-fit
I’m working on a small injection-molded housing for an automotive sensor, using PA6 GF30. There are two snap-fit arms inside (cantilever type), about 2 mm-thick walls. I’m not sure where to place the ejector... read more
M
T
5
36
Jul 18
Adding countersinks to formed stainless sheet metal
Hello, I'm working on a sheet metal enclosure (as in the image) that requires flush mounting for M6 countersunk screws. I need to add a countersink on a few holes, but the part is... read more
D
M
D
2
81
Jul 03