en – Global
Knowledge & Community
Search
K
Quote & source your parts
select
navigate
switch tabs
Esc close

MJF or carbon DLS for flexible TPU parts?

0
M
1

Hello, I’m working on a project that requires TPU/EPU parts for vibration damping and energy absorption, with a focus on resilience and tear resistance. I’m comparing HP MJF and Carbon DLS™ for these parts in terms of print speed, surface quality (for exposed parts with fine detail), and cost efficiency for small to mid-sized batches. I’d appreciate insights from anyone who has experience with both technologies, especially for similar applications.

Solved by Paolo F.

Both HP MJF and Carbon DLS are great options for durable parts, especially with TPU/EPU. From what I've seen, MJF gives you more freedom with complex designs and works well for high-mix production. DLS does have smoother surfaces right off the bat, but with MJF, you can get decent surface quality by using chemical vapor smoothing after printing. So if you need more design flexibility and are okay with some post-processing, MJF could still be a good choice. Here’s a helpful resource on working with rubber materials for more info.

    • M

      Hello, I’m working on a project that requires TPU/EPU parts for vibration damping and energy absorption, with a focus on resilience and tear resistance. I’m comparing HP MJF and Carbon DLS™ for these parts in terms of print speed, surface quality (for exposed parts with fine detail), and cost efficiency for small to mid-sized batches. I’d appreciate insights from anyone who has experience with both technologies, especially for similar applications.

      0
    • P

      Both HP MJF and Carbon DLS are great options for durable parts, especially with TPU/EPU. From what I’ve seen, MJF gives you more freedom with complex designs and works well for high-mix production. DLS does have smoother surfaces right off the bat, but with MJF, you can get decent surface quality by using chemical vapor smoothing after printing. So if you need more design flexibility and are okay with some post-processing, MJF could still be a good choice. Here’s a helpful resource on working with rubber materials for more info.

      0
      Reply
MJF or carbon DLS for flexible TPU parts?
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
Gasket material for short-term hydrotest on carbon steel piping
Looking for advice on selecting a gasket material for temporary spool joints during a hydrotest on carbon steel piping in a refinery. The test medium will be demineralized water (low conductivity, no additives), and... read more
C
0
13
Nov 26
Acrylic or pc for outdoor enclosures
hi! For transparent cover for an outdoor sensor needs to stay clear, handle some impacts, and resist sunlight - would you go with acrylic or polycarbonate? Acrylic has better UV and scratch resistance, but... read more
L
D
3
17
Nov 26
Best flexible 3D printing material for vibration-damping motor mounts
Hi Everyone! We’re designing a vibration-damping mounting bracket (approx. 150×80×40 mm) for a small electric motor housing, and we’re considering 3D printing it in a flexible material. Given the operating environment includes oil exposure,... read more
l
A
1
88
Nov 18
Best 3D printing material for child-safe educational toy prototype
Hello! I need advice on a small prototype for an educational toy aimed at children aged 3–6. It consists of interlocking geometric shapes (around 8–10 parts per set), with no mechanical function. I’m planning... read more
T
F
D
2
1.6k
Jul 16
Alodine coating enough for avionics enclosures?
Hi there, my project is a CNC machined enclosure in 6061-T6 aluminum for an avionics module that’ll be mounted in a wing compartment exposed to temperature swings, some humidity, but not direct salt spray.... read more
G
j
R
2
1.5k
Jul 15