select
navigate
switch tabs
Esc close

Maximum safe draw depth for aluminum

0
E
6

Hi everyone, I’m designing an automotive underbody heat shield using 0.8 mm thick aluminum alloy 5052-H32 for progressive die stamping. My main challenge is determining the optimal draw depth for complex geometries without risking material thinning or tearing. Some areas of the part require a draw depth of up to 25 mm. Given the material properties and thickness, I’m concerned about maintaining part integrity during the deep drawing process. 

I’m looking for advice on:

  • Calculating the maximum safe draw depth for this specific material and thickness
  • Strategies to achieve deeper draws without compromising material integrity

Has anyone worked with similar geometries and materials? What approaches have you found successful in optimizing draw depth while ensuring part quality?

Solved by Marshall

Hi,
To perform a basic check you can check the limiting draw ratio (LDR) using this formula: LDR =Dmax/d

Where Dmax is the maximum diameter of the blank and d is the diameter of the punch. You can determine the blank diameter using: r1 = r2(r2 + 2H)

Where r1 is the radius of the blank, r2 radius of the cup and H is the height of the cup. Once you have the blank radius you can calculate the LDR. Ultimately, you need to get the specific LDR for the material you are using from the material supplier. If your calculated LDR falls in the recommended range indicated by the supplier, then you should be able to deep draw the material. 

    • E

      Hi everyone, I’m designing an automotive underbody heat shield using 0.8 mm thick aluminum alloy 5052-H32 for progressive die stamping. My main challenge is determining the optimal draw depth for complex geometries without risking material thinning or tearing. Some areas of the part require a draw depth of up to 25 mm. Given the material properties and thickness, I’m concerned about maintaining part integrity during the deep drawing process. 

      I’m looking for advice on:

      • Calculating the maximum safe draw depth for this specific material and thickness
      • Strategies to achieve deeper draws without compromising material integrity

      Has anyone worked with similar geometries and materials? What approaches have you found successful in optimizing draw depth while ensuring part quality?

      0
    • M

      Hi,
      To perform a basic check you can check the limiting draw ratio (LDR) using this formula: LDR =Dmax/d

      Where Dmax is the maximum diameter of the blank and d is the diameter of the punch. You can determine the blank diameter using: r1 = r2(r2 + 2H)

      Where r1 is the radius of the blank, r2 radius of the cup and H is the height of the cup. Once you have the blank radius you can calculate the LDR. Ultimately, you need to get the specific LDR for the material you are using from the material supplier. If your calculated LDR falls in the recommended range indicated by the supplier, then you should be able to deep draw the material. 

      0
      Reply
      • E
        Marshall

        Thank you Marshall, the calculation you provided seems to be for a cylindrical shape, how can I determine the max draw depth of more complex shapes?

        0
        Reply
      • M
        Esme Shaw

        The above equation was presented as a simple way to check if your material can be deep drawn. If it fails this check then it definitely won’t work for more complex shapes. For a more detailed analysis on a complex geometry, you will have to perform an FEA analysis. Alternatively, you can reach out to a deep drawing company as they will have more than enough experience to tell you if you can or cannot manufacture your part using your chosen material.

        0
        Reply
      • L
        Marshall

        As another user mentioned, you will not be able to do a simple hand calculation to check if your material can be deep-drawn. However, there are a few techniques that can reduce the possibility of failure when deep drawing difficult geometries. For example, lubrication, die design, and blank clamp pressure optimization can all help reduce common failure modes.

        0
        Reply
      • E
        Lloyd

        These interventions will all be in the control of the workshop manufacturing the part, is there anything I can do from a design or material selection perspective to improve formability?

        0
        Reply
      • L
        Esme Shaw

        Hi Esme, one thing I can think of is to use a softer material, for example, 5052-O, and then temper the completed part to 5050-H32.

        0
        Reply
Maximum safe draw depth for aluminum
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
Cracking at snap-fit hook base in SLS PA12
Hello everyone, I'm using SLS 3D printing (PA12, 0.12 mm layer height) to create a snap-fit enclosure for a handheld sensor device. The enclosure has three internal hooks that flex about 1.5 mm during... read more
F
A
1
53
May 26
Choosing sheet metal thickness for a lightweight bracket
Hey, working on a small mounting bracket for a consumer electronics housing, cut and bent from stainless steel sheet (304 or 316). The part needs to stay under 200g, but it also has to... read more
D
M
1
79
May 23
Visibility of parting line on GF30 PA6 injection molded handle
Hello everyone, how visible can the parting line be on final molded parts? My team is currently designing a handle cover for an industrial machine, injection molded in PA6 with 30% glass fiber. Aesthetics... read more
T
C
1
87
May 06
Minimum embossed text size for TPU molding
Hey there, I'm designing a flexible watch strap that will be injection molded in TPU (Shore 85A). I want to include some small embossed text (branding and serial number) directly on the strap, but... read more
A
n
2
145
May 05
Printed bracket cracking – how to reinforce?
Hi,  I'm prototyping a small bracket for holding a plastic cover in place—roughly 60 × 30 × 10 mm, with two hooks and two screw holes (M3) on the top side. I printed it in PLA with 20% infill... read more
G
R
1
147
Apr 23