select
navigate
switch tabs
Esc close

Optimizing support structures for DMLS printing

0
T
2

Hello everyone, I’m working on a DMLS turbine blade with some overhangs and complex curvature, and I’ve run into challenges with support structures. I’ve noticed that removing the supports leaves marks and sometimes even warps the part, especially with unsupported angles over 30°. I’ve shortened the CAD file, but I’d appreciate any advice on minimizing the use of support structures while still ensuring the part prints correctly. Are there specific design modifications or strategies that have worked well for you to reduce post-processing issues like warping or stress? This is my part and a section through it:

Solved by Christopher_K

Another target is minimal-contact or tree supports, to reduce contact with the part, reducing post-processing. These blades will be challenging to get to a good finish. Materialize Magics and Autodesk Netfabb allows customized support thickness and contact points, helping control where and how much the supports connect.

It can help if you reinforce by thickening walls or adding ribs to distribute heat more evenly, reducing warping. Internal ribs within the back-face hollow might help a lot in imposing rigidity. Consider heat paths during printing, as uneven cooling causes distortion. Slower, controlled cooling can also help reduce stress and improve dimensional stability.

    • T

      Hello everyone, I’m working on a DMLS turbine blade with some overhangs and complex curvature, and I’ve run into challenges with support structures. I’ve noticed that removing the supports leaves marks and sometimes even warps the part, especially with unsupported angles over 30°. I’ve shortened the CAD file, but I’d appreciate any advice on minimizing the use of support structures while still ensuring the part prints correctly. Are there specific design modifications or strategies that have worked well for you to reduce post-processing issues like warping or stress? This is my part and a section through it:

      0
    • a

      Hey Theodore, your part is challenging—a lot of steep overhangs and need for full supports across the whole diameter, combined with thin sections that need to be held to shape. To minimize support structures in easy-printing layouts for DMLS, you can start by optimizing the build orientation. Your part might work best mounted with blade tips toward the table. You can’t control the overhang angles by orienting, but thermal management will be helpful because there’ll be a bigger thermal mass before the full diametral strain needs to be accommodated.

      Variable support intensity should work—where the blades are at a shallower angle (the long blade tips) and closer to the core, less support will be needed—though that’s complex to specify in the CAM software. But this reduces the need for support, so less cleanup is needed.

      1
      Reply
      1
    • C

      Another target is minimal-contact or tree supports, to reduce contact with the part, reducing post-processing. These blades will be challenging to get to a good finish. Materialize Magics and Autodesk Netfabb allows customized support thickness and contact points, helping control where and how much the supports connect.

      It can help if you reinforce by thickening walls or adding ribs to distribute heat more evenly, reducing warping. Internal ribs within the back-face hollow might help a lot in imposing rigidity. Consider heat paths during printing, as uneven cooling causes distortion. Slower, controlled cooling can also help reduce stress and improve dimensional stability.

      0
      Reply
Optimizing support structures for DMLS printing
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
Slim linear guide for precise lab automation stage
I’m designing a compact linear stage for a lab automation setup, used to move a microplate (about 300 grams) precisely along a 150 mm travel. The system needs to achieve repeatability under ±0.05 mm... read more
J
0
92
Advice on plastic insert gripping an inner rotating tube
Hello, I'm designing a plastic coupling sleeve to mount an aluminum shaft (20 mm OD) from the inside. The sleeve needs to grip the shaft firmly enough to transmit rotational torque from a small... read more
P
J
4
114
Aug 21
O-ring seal design for removable marine sensor housing
Hi! My project is a small-scale marine sensor housing; it needs to stay functional when briefly submerged (around 0.5 m depth) or exposed to heavy splashes on a boat deck. I’m using a machined... read more
H
H
D
9
512
Aug 22
Compact two-axis rotation without U-joints?
Hi all! I’m building a compact gimbal for a sensor head that needs to rotate around two perpendicular axes (pan and tilt). I’m trying to stay away from standard U-joints — they take up... read more
D
b
4
1.4k
Aug 14
SLA wall thickness issue for microfluidic channels
Hi, I created a 3D design for a small microfluidic part using SLA (Clear Resin) with internal channels ~0.4 mm wide and wall thickness around 0.5 mm. The function relies on optical inspection through... read more
B
c
1
194
Jul 29