Optimizing support structures for DMLS printing

0
T
2

Hello everyone, I’m working on a DMLS turbine blade with some overhangs and complex curvature, and I’ve run into challenges with support structures. I’ve noticed that removing the supports leaves marks and sometimes even warps the part, especially with unsupported angles over 30°. I’ve shortened the CAD file, but I’d appreciate any advice on minimizing the use of support structures while still ensuring the part prints correctly. Are there specific design modifications or strategies that have worked well for you to reduce post-processing issues like warping or stress? This is my part and a section through it:

Solved by Christopher_K

Another target is minimal-contact or tree supports, to reduce contact with the part, reducing post-processing. These blades will be challenging to get to a good finish. Materialize Magics and Autodesk Netfabb allows customized support thickness and contact points, helping control where and how much the supports connect.

It can help if you reinforce by thickening walls or adding ribs to distribute heat more evenly, reducing warping. Internal ribs within the back-face hollow might help a lot in imposing rigidity. Consider heat paths during printing, as uneven cooling causes distortion. Slower, controlled cooling can also help reduce stress and improve dimensional stability.

    • T

      Hello everyone, I’m working on a DMLS turbine blade with some overhangs and complex curvature, and I’ve run into challenges with support structures. I’ve noticed that removing the supports leaves marks and sometimes even warps the part, especially with unsupported angles over 30°. I’ve shortened the CAD file, but I’d appreciate any advice on minimizing the use of support structures while still ensuring the part prints correctly. Are there specific design modifications or strategies that have worked well for you to reduce post-processing issues like warping or stress? This is my part and a section through it:

      0
    • a

      Hey Theodore, your part is challenging—a lot of steep overhangs and need for full supports across the whole diameter, combined with thin sections that need to be held to shape. To minimize support structures in easy-printing layouts for DMLS, you can start by optimizing the build orientation. Your part might work best mounted with blade tips toward the table. You can’t control the overhang angles by orienting, but thermal management will be helpful because there’ll be a bigger thermal mass before the full diametral strain needs to be accommodated.

      Variable support intensity should work—where the blades are at a shallower angle (the long blade tips) and closer to the core, less support will be needed—though that’s complex to specify in the CAM software. But this reduces the need for support, so less cleanup is needed.

      0
      Reply
    • C

      Another target is minimal-contact or tree supports, to reduce contact with the part, reducing post-processing. These blades will be challenging to get to a good finish. Materialize Magics and Autodesk Netfabb allows customized support thickness and contact points, helping control where and how much the supports connect.

      It can help if you reinforce by thickening walls or adding ribs to distribute heat more evenly, reducing warping. Internal ribs within the back-face hollow might help a lot in imposing rigidity. Consider heat paths during printing, as uneven cooling causes distortion. Slower, controlled cooling can also help reduce stress and improve dimensional stability.

      0
      Reply
Optimizing support structures for DMLS printing
Your information:




Suggested Topics

Topic
Replies
Views
Activity
Will a 6mm dowel fit in this hole?
hello, I'm designing a part with an FDM 3D printed hole to hold a 6mm wooden dowel, but I’m unsure about the actual fit due to print tolerances and material shrinkage. The hole is... read more
b
1
33
Mar 14
Manufacturing in Germany
Hello,Does Xometry support us in setting up a workshop in Germany and producing there?
1
41
Mar 05
Should I use gd&t or traditional linear dimensions for tight tolerances on motor mount bracket?
Hi! I am creating a 2D drawing for the bracket of an electric motor, which requires precise specifications regarding the placement of holes and the flatness of surfaces. This drawing is for production purposes,... read more
E
D
C
2
79
Feb 03
Draft angles for master model?
hi, I’m designing the master model for a silicone mold (for vacuum casting) and wondering about the necessity of incorporating draft angles. Is it always required to include draft angles in the design, or... read more
P
R
3
100
Jan 22
Is drawing needed for modeled threads?
Hello, I have a modeled anti-backlash lead screw shown in the image below:My question is: when the thread is already modeled in the CAD file, is it still necessary to include a detailed drawing... read more
P
2
74
Jan 17